Originally posted by MatthewChor at 2005-5-17 13:31: 29,36...anyone can explain
使用道具 舉報
Originally posted by MatthewChor at 2005-5-17 01:32 PM: yes.....2PbO + PbO2 = Pb3O4
Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-5-17 13:33: i use 2元1次聯立方程解
Originally posted by MatthewChor at 2005-5-17 13:32: yes.....2PbO + PbO2 = Pb3O4 it hv round off problem Pb should 90.7% by mass
Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-5-17 01:32 PM: 29 cannot explain seems that 1st statement correct but 2nd wrong 36 越底metallic bond越弱
Originally posted by alan_given at 2005-5-17 01:33 PM: 好~delete佢
Originally posted by MatthewChor at 2005-5-17 01:34 PM: 29.....yes lor 36.....that's why melting pt decrease? why not reducing power ge
Originally posted by alan_given at 2005-5-17 13:33: 好~delete佢
Originally posted by MatthewChor at 2005-5-17 01:34 PM: 要我sub 2:3 同 3:4
Originally posted by pancake at 2005-5-17 01:35 PM: 36 i choose b also
Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-5-17 01:34 PM: 越大lose electrons 越容易=>reducing power increases
Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-5-17 13:36: 我覺得一定唔係 btw 第48題係...
Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-5-17 01:35 PM: i calculate 1:1.34 not need sub wor
Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-5-17 01:36 PM: 我選B
Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-5-17 01:36 PM: btw 第48題係...
Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-5-17 01:37 PM: 36 唔係A 咩?
Originally posted by 2076 at 2005-5-17 01:37 PM: x2 我覺得enhance依個字係關鍵 but o個d 3大神全部揀A wor
Originally posted by MatthewChor at 2005-5-17 13:36: get the wrong meaning I think it is ability to gain electron.... should be 48/50
本版積分規則 發表回復 回帖並轉播 回帖後跳轉到最後一頁
Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|HKCM
GMT+8, 2026-8-17 17:45 , Processed in 0.040987 second(s), 14 queries .
Powered by Discuz! X3.5
© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.