論壇 › 籃球地帶 › NBA 討論區 (2月1 - 3月1)

Eggio 發表於 2007-2-22 20:18:10

NYK傾緊Vince Carter:icon101:

輝 發表於 2007-2-22 20:22:37

net大貪到想

carter <--> frye + crawford + lee

http://img.miniforum.net/temp1/emotion/em21.gif http://img.miniforum.net/temp1/emotion/em21.gif

但knicks唔肯,至多m.rose:icon101:

[ 本帖最後由 輝 於 2007-2-2208:24 PM 編輯 ]

Eggio 發表於 2007-2-22 20:24:01

原帖由 輝 於 2007-2-2208:22 PM 發表
net大貪到想

carter <--> frye + crawford + lee

http://img.miniforum.net/temp1/emotion/em21.gif http://img.miniforum.net/temp1/emotion/em21.gif

但knicks唔肯,至多m.rosehttp://img.minif ...
David Lee唔放得啦下話:icon102:

Eggio 發表於 2007-2-22 20:25:25

Why is the trade important to Cleveland? It would instantly make the Cavaliers (31-22) a legitimate NBA Finals contender in the woeful East, where they stand just 2&frac12; games behind the conference-leading Pistons. Bibby is shooting a career-worst 38.8 percent this season, and his averages of 16.6 points and 5.2 assists are four-year lows. But he's only 28 and would give the Cavaliers the starting point guard they've long desired. He's also one of the best clutch shooters in the league with 3-point range. Cleveland would create immense matchup problems with LeBron James, Bibby and Larry Hughes on the wing, which would generate more space inside for center Zydrunas Ilgauskas.

LeBron+Hughes+Bibby
一個球夠玩嗎:icon101:

henrytam 發表於 2007-2-22 20:26:13

原帖由 輝 於 2007-2-2208:22 PM 發表
net大貪到想

carter <--> frye + crawford + lee

http://img.miniforum.net/temp1/emotion/em21.gif http://img.miniforum.net/temp1/emotion/em21.gif

但knicks唔肯,至多m.rose:icon101:

要fyre又要lee好似有點過分:icon101:

henrytam 發表於 2007-2-22 20:28:57

原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-2-2208:25 PM 發表
Why is the trade important to Cleveland? It would instantly make the Cavaliers (31-22) a legitimate NBA Finals contender in the woeful East, where they stand just 2&frac12; games behind the confere ...

我覺得可能夠玩的:icon101:

Eggio 發表於 2007-2-22 20:31:06

原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-2-2208:28 PM 發表


我覺得可能夠玩的:icon101:
如果LeBron+Bibby應該ok
加埋Larry Hughes就唔夠了:icon101:

輝 發表於 2007-2-22 20:37:16

大帝一場比賽已經霸左波四十分鐘啦
唔俾多一兩個波佢地真係唔夠玩

Panho17 發表於 2007-2-22 20:39:53

原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-2-2208:31 PM 發表

如果LeBron+Bibby應該ok
加埋Larry Hughes就唔夠了:icon101:

用Gibson仲好啦...

Smithy 發表於 2007-2-22 21:08:13

原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-2-2208:31 PM 發表

如果LeBron+Bibby應該ok
加埋Larry Hughes就唔夠了:icon101: Hughes唔係宜家都冇乜得點玩咩
想玩既要自己偷到波先得:icon101:

Eggio 發表於 2007-2-22 21:17:26

原帖由 Smithy 於 2007-2-2209:08 PM 發表
Hughes唔係宜家都冇乜得點玩咩
想玩既要自己偷到波先得:icon101:
所以咪話佢係度就唔夠玩:icon101:
Bibby比起Hughes無咁需要有波在手:icon101:

Smithy 發表於 2007-2-22 21:47:57

原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-2-2209:17 PM 發表

所以咪話佢係度就唔夠玩:icon101:
Bibby比起Hughes無咁需要有波在手:icon101: 初頭仲諗住Hughes可以做到LBJ身邊果一個
點知都係:icon101:

WainSeven 發表於 2007-2-22 21:56:23

原帖由 Eggio 於 2007-2-2208:24 PM 發表

David Lee唔放得啦下話:icon102:
:icon075::icon075::icon075:
李大衛點都要o係NY拎番張千萬合同先走啦:icon023::icon101:

射手shooter 發表於 2007-2-22 22:34:12

唔X係咁嚇我掛:icon101:

Kurt Thomas + Raja Bel l+ 1st round pick from Hawks = KIDD

Smithy 發表於 2007-2-22 22:42:53

原帖由 射手shooter 於 2007-2-2210:34 PM 發表
唔X係咁嚇我掛:icon101:

Kurt Thomas + Raja Bel l+ 1st round pick from Hawks = KIDD NASH X KIDD:icon101:

Penny仔 發表於 2007-2-22 22:54:07

原帖由 射手shooter 於 2007-2-2210:34 PM 發表
唔X係咁嚇我掛:icon101:

Kurt Thomas + Raja Bel l+ 1st round pick from Hawks = KIDD
.......:icon071:

輝 發表於 2007-2-22 23:03:31

原帖由 Smithy 於 2007-2-2210:42 PM 發表
NASH X KIDD:icon101:
有係番一齊??
以前kidd帶住nash
而家......:icon101:

捷禾@Ajax 發表於 2007-2-22 23:12:09

原帖由 射手shooter 於 2007-2-2210:34 PM 發表
唔X係咁嚇我掛:icon101:

Kurt Thomas + Raja Bel l+ 1st round pick from Hawks = KIDD
2pg:eek2::icon101:

Eggio 發表於 2007-2-22 23:42:05

原帖由 射手shooter 於 2007-2-2210:34 PM 發表
唔X係咁嚇我掛:icon101:

Kurt Thomas + Raja Bel l+ 1st round pick from Hawks = KIDD
:icon110::icon101:
要兩個老控球做乜:icon101:

WainSeven 發表於 2007-2-23 00:28:40

原帖由 射手shooter 於 2007-2-2210:34 PM 發表
唔X係咁嚇我掛:icon101:

Kurt Thomas + Raja Bel l+ 1st round pick from Hawks = KIDD
要太陽班主比奢侈稅是不可能的事:icon032:

查看完整版本: NBA 討論區 (2月1 - 3月1)