joekjen 發表於 2005-8-4 20:10:28

Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-4 08:08 PM:

馬里安納其實係唔係係馬來西亞?:icon101:



...................................

十萬九千七里到ｏ者

食脾細路 發表於 2005-8-4 20:11:38

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-8-4 08:01 PM:


咁日本係有make decision去炸Pearl Harbour ge..
係US專登唔avoid件事發生je......:icon101:
"我地家下被比人,為左全國上下ge安全,我地要參戰"
點都比
"我地要為正義而戰"or
"我地要幫我們ge好朋友"
有游說力:icon101::icon101:

食脾細路 發表於 2005-8-4 20:12:29

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-8-4 08:10 PM:
...................................

十萬九千七里到ｏ者
公主:講真,淆底都係人之常情:icon101:

hehe0114 發表於 2005-8-4 20:12:40

Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-4 08:11 PM:

"我地家下被比人,為左全國上下ge安全,我地要參戰"
點都比
"我地要為正義而戰"or
"我地要幫我們ge好朋友"
有游說力:icon101::icon101:

仲有佢自己企起身、企係度講

橙色力量 發表於 2005-8-4 20:13:49

Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-4 08:06 PM:

笑咩:icon101::icon101::icon101:

差唔多等於世足嘅「說服力」爭論。:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:

食脾細路 發表於 2005-8-4 20:15:51

Originally posted by 橙色力量 at 2005-8-4 08:13 PM:


差唔多等於世足「說服力」爭論。:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:
我問你,你ge立場係老鼠到定係老狐到:icon101:

銀公主 發表於 2005-8-4 20:16:00

Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-4 08:12 PM:

公主:講真,淆底都係人之常情:icon101:

呢次關淆底咩事?:confused:

橙色力量 發表於 2005-8-4 20:16:46

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-8-4 08:12 PM:


仲有佢自己企起身、企係度講

「米高悲」那部爛片，絕非史實！！！:icon119::icon066::icon083::icon106:

橙色力量 發表於 2005-8-4 20:17:59

Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-4 08:15 PM:

我問你,你ge立場係老鼠到定係老狐到:icon101:

當然係以少勝多者。:icon023:

joekjen 發表於 2005-8-4 20:18:02

:icon8:

HackerWong 發表於 2005-8-4 20:18:27

Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 4-8-05 08:11 PM:

"我地要為正義而戰"or
"我地要幫我們ge好朋友"
有游說力:icon101::icon101:

US個陣有幾多說服力ar?? :icon101:

食脾細路 發表於 2005-8-4 20:18:41

Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-8-4 08:12 PM:


仲有佢自己企起身、企係度講
激情的講話往往會而0sp發動精神 - 魂 + 氣力150:icon101:

HackerWong 發表於 2005-8-4 20:18:52

Originally posted by 橙色力量 at 4-8-05 08:17 PM:

當然係以少勝多者。:icon023:

:icon074:

食脾細路 發表於 2005-8-4 20:19:38

Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-8-4 08:16 PM:


呢次關淆底咩事?:confused:
地理問題:icon101:

joekjen 發表於 2005-8-4 20:20:16

Originally posted by 橙色力量 at 2005-8-4 08:17 PM:


當然係以少勝多者。:icon023:


以少勝多並非用兵之道，它並非戰術，只能說是一種奇術:icon021:

銀公主 發表於 2005-8-4 20:21:05

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-8-4 08:18 PM:


US個陣有幾多說服力ar?? :icon101:

我到而家都未知德國做咩要向美國宣戰
日本炸x美國關德國咩事...(雖則話同盟,但係十萬九千里o甘遠,都幫唔到d咩)

銀公主 發表於 2005-8-4 20:22:30

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-8-4 08:20 PM:



以少勝多並非用兵之道，它並非戰術，只能說是一種奇術:icon021:

人地總數量上係以少勝多
但係係個別既戰場上,係有集中兵力既優勢

食脾細路 發表於 2005-8-4 20:22:43

Originally posted by 橙色力量 at 2005-8-4 08:17 PM:


當然係以少勝多者。:icon023:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/0a/Rommel_portrait.jpg/220px-Rommel_portrait.jpgVShttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e4/Bernard_Law_Montgomery.jpg/250px-Bernard_Law_Montgomery.jpg

:icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101::icon101:

[ Last edited by 食脾細路 on 4-8-2005 at 08:23 PM ]

HackerWong 發表於 2005-8-4 20:23:12

Originally posted by 銀公主 at 4-8-05 08:21 PM:

我到而家都未知德國做咩要向美國宣戰
日本炸x美國關德國咩事...(雖則話同盟,但係十萬九千里o甘遠,都幫唔到d咩)

覺得d美國商船係Europe"音音揚揚"好煩掛?? :icon101:

橙色力量 發表於 2005-8-4 20:23:27

Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-8-4 08:21 PM:


我到而家都未知德國做咩要向美國宣戰

要叫龍婆問下老希......:icon101::icon101::icon101:
頁: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
查看完整版本: 二次大戰(有目錄XD)