Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-9-19 02:16 AM:
lee clark可以譯做奇勒
呢位老將九十年代中都效力過紐卡素
當時應該仲係古列治時代
唔該你.
九十年代中....到今時今日,我地都仲要倚靠佢...
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 02:21:
你講o既o野令我想起車仔時o既哈索賓基同古莊臣.
唉,宜家魯爾o既表現係會直接影響皇馬嫁...我都係皇馬fans,我第二愛隊.
嘿..魯爾的確係表現不濟,但係佢肯定唔係當下影響皇家馬德里最深嘅球員..
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:00 AM:
嘿..魯爾的確係表現不濟,但係佢肯定唔係當下影響皇家馬德里最深嘅球員..
我想問,如果宜家皇馬打得好好,而魯爾已經唔再係主力.
咁你又可唔可以接受?
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 03:04 AM:
我想問,如果宜家皇馬打得好好,而魯爾已經唔再係主力.
咁你又可唔可以接受?
every player has their use by date:icon099:
Congrulations NU for first win...:icon101::icon101:
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 03:04:
我想問,如果宜家皇馬打得好好,而魯爾已經唔再係主力.
咁你又可唔可以接受?
會,但係唔太可能..再者,踢得好嘅定義人人唔同..
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:13 AM:
會,但係唔太可能..再者,踢得好嘅定義人人唔同..
唔會冇可能.
睇下魯爾佢自己點諗,如果佢要走冇人阻到佢.
佢想憑一己之力扭轉皇馬狀況已經冇可能,反而佢走o左就會代表皇馬一個時代 o既終結,對雙方都未必係壞事.
皇馬o既成功都唔係一朝一夕,一時..或者話幾季o既失敗又點,始終我相信呢個球會有一日會再站起來.
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 03:43:
唔會冇可能.
睇下魯爾佢自己點諗,如果佢要走冇人阻到佢.
佢想憑一己之力扭轉皇馬狀況已經冇可能,反而佢走o左就會代表皇馬一個時代 o既終結,對雙方都未必係壞事.
皇馬o既成功都唔係一朝一夕,一時..或者話幾季o既失敗又點,始終我相信呢個球會有一日會再站起來.
皇家馬德里嘅失敗亦絕非一朝一夕..
魯爾講過,只要對皇家馬德里好,佢願意離隊..
但係問題只出喺魯爾身上咩?
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:58 AM:
皇家馬德里嘅失敗亦絕非一朝一夕..
魯爾講過,只要對皇家馬德里好,佢願意離隊..
但係問題只出喺魯爾身上咩?
問題有好多,佢自己本身都有責任,但絕對唔可以話出o係佢身上.
不過其實宜家球會咁打法,對球會同佢自己雙方都辛苦.
好似一對已經唔夾o既情侶咁,未必係邊一方出o左問題,合則來,不合則去law,冇謂浪費大家o既時間.
Owen finishing竟然唔叫好:eek:
仲要剩係得speed?
淨係佢d走位入涉都睇到佢唔止speed啦下話:icon110:
你又唔係搵佢黎開路
比希斯基咁大隻佢都冇用架喎:o
仲要搵Henry比
你搵佢比咁世界上都唔見得有幾多個前鋒叫好:o
我覺得樓主真係過份睇小Owen喎
Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:58 AM:
皇家馬德里嘅失敗亦絕非一朝一夕..
魯爾講過,只要對皇家馬德里好,佢願意離隊..
但係問題只出喺魯爾身上咩?
到時候, 魯爾真係走, 皇馬仲夠膽sell 自己的文化? 皇馬再不配做皇馬:o
現在起碼還有個驅殼:o
Originally posted by FlyingDonkey at 2005-9-19 11:02 AM:
到時候, 魯爾真係走, 皇馬仲夠膽sell 自己的文化? 皇馬再不配做皇馬:o
現在起碼還有個驅殼:o
只係得個驅殼,
而沒有靈魂既,
我寧願佢改革...
當然, 呢個只係我既睇法.
Originally posted by bce1026 at 2005-9-19 10:50 AM:
Owen finishing竟然唔叫好:eek:
仲要剩係得speed?
淨係佢d走位入涉都睇到佢唔止speed啦下話:icon110:
你又唔係搵佢黎開路
比希斯基咁大隻佢都冇用架喎:o
仲要搵Henry比
你搵佢比咁世界上都唔見得有幾多個前 ...
奧雲, 唔係話咁差,
但係覺得佢絕對唔值呢個價,(雖則英人出名貴)
佢踢左咁耐波, 完全唔覺得佢有d咩進步,
咁多年都係靠速度, 走位入涉,比人睇死晒,
finishing 我諗佢最多算中上..
Originally posted by Siu_Boo at 2005-9-19 12:50 PM:
只係得個驅殼,
而沒有靈魂既,
我寧願佢改革...
當然, 呢個只係我既睇法.
佩雷斯唔退.....:o
Originally posted by Siu_Boo at 2005-9-19 12:55 PM:
奧雲, 唔係話咁差,
但係覺得佢絕對唔值呢個價,(雖則英人出名貴)
佢踢左咁耐波, 完全唔覺得佢有d咩進步,
咁多年都係靠速度, 走位入涉,比人睇死晒,
finishing 我諗佢最多算中上..
差唔多啦...買前鋒...千幾萬鎊...Cisse 都一千萬鎊啦:icon101:
Originally posted by Siu_Boo at 2005-9-19 12:55 PM:
奧雲, 唔係話咁差,
但係覺得佢絕對唔值呢個價,(雖則英人出名貴)
佢踢左咁耐波, 完全唔覺得佢有d咩進步,
咁多年都係靠速度, 走位入涉,比人睇死晒,
finishing 我諗佢最多算中上..
佢同當年的db一樣,可以唔止打死一瓣波,可以有更大的進步空間,可惜.........
Originally posted by 阿sa at 2005-9-19 01:37 PM:
差唔多啦...買前鋒...千幾萬鎊...Cisse 都一千萬鎊啦:icon101:
jj都 7m:icon105:
Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 01:58:
重點係...佢接應都有問題,唔好講話埋門.
想像一下,佢打箭頭,快放入去o既時候,佢要同d高大後衛衝撞,又要控球.
呢D一切都同佢身型技術有關.
如果想像到
佢弱冠之年根本唔可以響英超立足
Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-9-19 01:55:
穩守突擊+大腳長傳:icon101:
咁似講緊利記既:o:icon126:
奇勒 - KK年代已經係青年軍到升上,佢係古生年代同古生反面,之後比人賣左
佢同保耶都係純工兵球員,係無創造力球員支援下係唔會有任何作用
泰萊 - 我同外國好多人ge講法一樣: 佢仲年輕,錯多一兩次會係一件好事
因為唔試過錯,日後係唔會學到野
尼索比亞 - 佢家下先17,佢真正當打個時盧基都差唔多退啦:o
上年西甲奧雲係比到我射術,技術同走位
今年我覺得都係時間ge關係
而上年係RM到Owen明顯地比到我睇到聰明ge打法:o
Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-9-19 07:56 PM:
奇勒 - KK年代已經係青年軍到升上,佢係古生年代同古生反面,之後比人賣左
佢同保耶都係純工兵球員,係無創造力球員支援下係唔會有任何作用
泰萊 - 我同外國好多人ge講法一樣: 佢仲年輕,錯多一兩次會係一件好事
...
下場可以有咩主力出得番?:icon107: