紐卡素賽後報告.

PENNYDIOR

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-9-19 02:16 AM:
lee clark可以譯做奇勒
呢位老將九十年代中都效力過紐卡素
當時應該仲係古列治時代

唔該你.

九十年代中....到今時今日,我地都仲要倚靠佢...

Raul_Gonzalez

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 02:21:


你講o既o野令我想起車仔時o既哈索賓基同古莊臣.

唉,宜家魯爾o既表現係會直接影響皇馬嫁...我都係皇馬fans,我第二愛隊.

嘿..魯爾的確係表現不濟,但係佢肯定唔係當下影響皇家馬德里最深嘅球員..

PENNYDIOR

Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:00 AM:


嘿..魯爾的確係表現不濟,但係佢肯定唔係當下影響皇家馬德里最深嘅球員..

我想問,如果宜家皇馬打得好好,而魯爾已經唔再係主力.

咁你又可唔可以接受?

Akwun

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 03:04 AM:


我想問,如果宜家皇馬打得好好,而魯爾已經唔再係主力.

咁你又可唔可以接受?

every player has their use by date

Congrulations NU for first win...

Raul_Gonzalez

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 03:04:


我想問,如果宜家皇馬打得好好,而魯爾已經唔再係主力.

咁你又可唔可以接受?

會,但係唔太可能..再者,踢得好嘅定義人人唔同..

PENNYDIOR

Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:13 AM:


會,但係唔太可能..再者,踢得好嘅定義人人唔同..

唔會冇可能.

睇下魯爾佢自己點諗,如果佢要走冇人阻到佢.

佢想憑一己之力扭轉皇馬狀況已經冇可能,反而佢走o左就會代表皇馬一個時代   o既終結,對雙方都未必係壞事.

皇馬o既成功都唔係一朝一夕,一時..或者話幾季o既失敗又點,始終我相信呢個球會有一日會再站起來.

Raul_Gonzalez

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 03:43:


唔會冇可能.

睇下魯爾佢自己點諗,如果佢要走冇人阻到佢.

佢想憑一己之力扭轉皇馬狀況已經冇可能,反而佢走o左就會代表皇馬一個時代   o既終結,對雙方都未必係壞事.

皇馬o既成功都唔係一朝一夕,一時..或者話幾季o既失敗又點,始終我相信呢個球會有一日會再站起來.

皇家馬德里嘅失敗亦絕非一朝一夕..

魯爾講過,只要對皇家馬德里好,佢願意離隊..

但係問題只出喺魯爾身上咩?

PENNYDIOR

Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:58 AM:


皇家馬德里嘅失敗亦絕非一朝一夕..

魯爾講過,只要對皇家馬德里好,佢願意離隊..

但係問題只出喺魯爾身上咩?

問題有好多,佢自己本身都有責任,但絕對唔可以話出o係佢身上.

不過其實宜家球會咁打法,對球會同佢自己雙方都辛苦.

好似一對已經唔夾o既情侶咁,未必係邊一方出o左問題,合則來,不合則去law,冇謂浪費大家o既時間.

bce1026

Owen finishing竟然唔叫好
仲要剩係得speed?
淨係佢d走位入涉都睇到佢唔止speed啦下話
你又唔係搵佢黎開路
比希斯基咁大隻佢都冇用架喎
仲要搵Henry比
你搵佢比咁世界上都唔見得有幾多個前鋒叫好

我覺得樓主真係過份睇小Owen喎

FlyingDonkey

Originally posted by Raul_Gonzalez at 2005-9-19 03:58 AM:


皇家馬德里嘅失敗亦絕非一朝一夕..

魯爾講過,只要對皇家馬德里好,佢願意離隊..

但係問題只出喺魯爾身上咩?

到時候, 魯爾真係走, 皇馬仲夠膽sell 自己的文化? 皇馬再不配做皇馬

現在起碼還有個驅殼

Siu_Boo

Originally posted by FlyingDonkey at 2005-9-19 11:02 AM:

到時候, 魯爾真係走, 皇馬仲夠膽sell 自己的文化? 皇馬再不配做皇馬

現在起碼還有個驅殼

只係得個驅殼,
而沒有靈魂既,
我寧願佢改革...
當然, 呢個只係我既睇法.

Siu_Boo

Originally posted by bce1026 at 2005-9-19 10:50 AM:
Owen finishing竟然唔叫好
仲要剩係得speed?
淨係佢d走位入涉都睇到佢唔止speed啦下話
你又唔係搵佢黎開路
比希斯基咁大隻佢都冇用架喎
仲要搵Henry比
你搵佢比咁世界上都唔見得有幾多個前 ...

奧雲, 唔係話咁差,
但係覺得佢絕對唔值呢個價,(雖則英人出名貴)
佢踢左咁耐波, 完全唔覺得佢有d咩進步,
咁多年都係靠速度, 走位入涉,比人睇死晒,
finishing 我諗佢最多算中上..

FlyingDonkey

Originally posted by Siu_Boo at 2005-9-19 12:50 PM:


只係得個驅殼,
而沒有靈魂既,
我寧願佢改革...
當然, 呢個只係我既睇法.

佩雷斯唔退.....

阿sa

Originally posted by Siu_Boo at 2005-9-19 12:55 PM:


奧雲, 唔係話咁差,
但係覺得佢絕對唔值呢個價,(雖則英人出名貴)
佢踢左咁耐波, 完全唔覺得佢有d咩進步,
咁多年都係靠速度, 走位入涉,比人睇死晒,
finishing 我諗佢最多算中上..

差唔多啦...買前鋒...千幾萬鎊...Cisse 都一千萬鎊啦

天才守門員

Originally posted by Siu_Boo at 2005-9-19 12:55 PM:


奧雲, 唔係話咁差,
但係覺得佢絕對唔值呢個價,(雖則英人出名貴)
佢踢左咁耐波, 完全唔覺得佢有d咩進步,
咁多年都係靠速度, 走位入涉,比人睇死晒,
finishing 我諗佢最多算中上..

佢同當年的db一樣,可以唔止打死一瓣波,可以有更大的進步空間,可惜.........

Donald

Originally posted by 阿sa at 2005-9-19 01:37 PM:

差唔多啦...買前鋒...千幾萬鎊...Cisse 都一千萬鎊啦

jj都 7m

利迷阿稹

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-9-19 01:58:


重點係...佢接應都有問題,唔好講話埋門.

想像一下,佢打箭頭,快放入去o既時候,佢要同d高大後衛衝撞,又要控球.

呢D一切都同佢身型技術有關.

如果想像到
佢弱冠之年根本唔可以響英超立足

rob_van_dam

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-9-19 01:55:

穩守突擊+大腳長傳

咁似講緊利記既

食脾細路

奇勒 - KK年代已經係青年軍到升上,佢係古生年代同古生反面,之後比人賣左
佢同保耶都係純工兵球員,係無創造力球員支援下係唔會有任何作用

泰萊 - 我同外國好多人ge講法一樣: 佢仲年輕,錯多一兩次會係一件好事
因為唔試過錯,日後係唔會學到野

尼索比亞 - 佢家下先17,佢真正當打個時盧基都差唔多退啦

上年西甲奧雲係比到我射術,技術同走位
今年我覺得都係時間ge關係
而上年係RM到Owen明顯地比到我睇到聰明ge打法

Donald

Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-9-19 07:56 PM:
奇勒 - KK年代已經係青年軍到升上,佢係古生年代同古生反面,之後比人賣左
佢同保耶都係純工兵球員,係無創造力球員支援下係唔會有任何作用

泰萊 - 我同外國好多人ge講法一樣: 佢仲年輕,錯多一兩次會係一件好事
...

下場可以有咩主力出得番?