熱刺#29戴維斯 發表於 2005-10-2 16:06:00

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:00 PM:
車仔次次用天價去買d非頂級ge players,真係有種吹漲ge feeling.. :(
岩用就得啦
理得佢唔頂級但係貴
千金難買心頭好

肥仔麟 發表於 2005-10-2 16:08:11

Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2005-10-2 04:06 PM:

岩用就得啦
理得佢唔頂級但係貴
千金難買心頭好
agree
杜奧巴果時都比人話唔值架 , 而家咪又比人讚都無論 ....

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:09:38

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2-10-05 04:03 PM:

比左你係球會老細 , 有球員比車路士睇中
老馮都托高10m8m喇 :icon101:

但Chelsea又肯比又比得起ar..
咁先吹漲:icon101:

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:10:25

Originally posted by Samaritans at 2-10-05 04:05 PM:


問題係何謂可觀先,
個人唔覺得進攻足球等於可觀喎

我係一個十分膚淺ge球迷.. :)

[ Last edited by HackerWong on 2-10-2005 at 04:12 PM ]

肥仔麟 發表於 2005-10-2 16:12:18

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:09 PM:


但Chelsea又肯比又比得起ar..
咁先吹漲:icon101:
我就係覺得好屈機 (比錢方面)
真係唔洗就住 , 好似玩fm咁.....
人地皇馬買到又賣球場 , 又要賣人 ,
車路士買完好似老__馮咁 :icon101:

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:13:39

Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2-10-05 04:06 PM:

岩用就得啦
理得佢唔頂級但係貴
千金難買心頭好

咁呢個世界無"買貴左"呢d歌仔.. :)

肥仔麟 發表於 2005-10-2 16:14:10

From 古都:

唔係車仔勁
係英超隊廢 :icon101:

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:14:27

Originally posted by Samaritans at 2005-10-2 04:05 PM:


問題係何謂可觀先,
個人唔覺得進攻足球等於可觀喎

咁進攻足球都有高手同低手之分的,而且在好的進攻足球中,球員的走位,短傳浸入個d真係好鬼正,可以比到觀眾刺激。

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:15:39

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2-10-05 04:14 PM:
From 古都:

唔係車仔勁
係英超隊廢 :icon101:

都係ge..
d英超隊呢1,2年收曬皮....

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:15:54

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2005-10-2 04:14 PM:
From 古都:

唔係車仔勁
係英超隊廢 :icon101:

萬二分認同,其他前列分子成日失分:(

Samaritans 發表於 2005-10-2 16:16:44

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:10 PM:


我係一個十分膚淺ge球迷.. :)

[ Last edited by HackerWong on 2-10-2005 at 04:12 PM ]

o甘當然唔係啦,
只不過証明到英超係咪悶場只係作者個人睇法o者

Smithy 發表於 2005-10-2 16:16:54

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2005-10-2 04:14 PM:
From 古都:

唔係車仔勁
係英超隊廢 :icon101: 好句:icon101:

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:17:38

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2005-10-2 04:08 PM:

agree
杜奧巴果時都比人話唔值架 , 而家咪又比人讚都無論 ....

始終覺得佢踢波的動作好:icon110:下,同施單個種完全相反:icon117:

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:18:52

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2-10-05 04:15 PM:


都係ge..
d英超隊呢1,2年收曬皮....

但比較下..
邊隊英超隊有資本可以想入咩人就入咩人?
而reserve同first team係近乎無實力分野??
:icon101:

肥仔麟 發表於 2005-10-2 16:19:09

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-10-2 04:17 PM:


始終覺得佢踢波的動作好:icon110:下,同施單個種完全相反:icon117:
zidane果d真係好睇又好食 ,
杜奧巴雖則無論樣貌同踢法都比較衝勁 :icon101: ,但最緊要入波同實際嗎

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:19:13

Originally posted by Smithy at 2005-10-2 04:16 PM:
好句:icon101:

七連勝 + 只失一球:(
英超真係有咩好睇,試轉睇西甲:icon117:

Samaritans 發表於 2005-10-2 16:19:24

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-10-2 04:17 PM:


始終覺得佢踢波的動作好:icon110:下,同施單個種完全相反:icon117:

查奧爾仲:icon110:喎

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:21:10

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:18 PM:


但比較下..
邊隊英超隊有資本可以想入咩人就入咩人?
而reserve同first team係近乎無實力分野??
:icon101:

其實曼聯有條件,不過咁樣的經營唔合理。

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:21:32

Originally posted by Donald at 2-10-05 04:19 PM:


七連勝 + 只失一球:(
英超真係有咩好睇,試轉睇西甲:icon117:

PL同La Liga各有特色ge..

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:22:02

Originally posted by Samaritans at 2005-10-2 04:19 PM:


查奧爾仲:icon110:喎

查查係黑施單:icon030:
頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9
查看完整版本: 呂大樂:英超悶場非一日之寒