HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:22:18

Originally posted by Donald at 2-10-05 04:21 PM:
其實曼聯有條件,不過咁樣的經營唔合理。

無得用=無條件.. :icon101:

Carr 發表於 2005-10-2 16:23:23

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-10-2 04:14 PM:


咁進攻足球都有高手同低手之分的,而且在好的進攻足球中,球員的走位,短傳浸入個d真係好鬼正,可以比到觀眾刺激。
好似今日Sunderland夠踢進攻足球, 但俾我既感覺係一群野獸不斷將個波打向龍門:icon101:

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:24:36

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:21 PM:


PL同La Liga各有特色ge..

競爭性已經大大減低了,而且球隊平均質素下降,睇左場保頓真係悶死:icon061::icon061:

銀公主 發表於 2005-10-2 16:27:02

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:00 PM:
車仔次次用天價去買d非頂級ge players,真係有種吹漲ge feeling.. :(

兩睇la
人地見到你係車仔wo,都有心抬高個價la

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:28:07

Originally posted by Carr at 2005-10-2 04:23 PM:

好似今日Sunderland夠踢進攻足球, 但俾我既感覺係一群野獸不斷將個波打向龍門:icon101:

當年溫布頓都算係踢進攻足球:icon105:

Fantasista 發表於 2005-10-2 16:28:13

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2005-10-2 04:14 PM:
From 古都:

唔係車仔勁
係英超隊廢 :icon101:

廢_:o

肥仔麟 發表於 2005-10-2 16:28:29

From:古都

d英超真係好鬼廢
當我知道愛華頓上年拎第4
之後uefa比人炒
我就想笑

:icon101:

熱刺#29戴維斯 發表於 2005-10-2 16:28:49

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:13 PM:


咁呢個世界無"買貴左"呢d歌仔.. :)
千金難買心頭好呢個情況正正就係衍生自"買貴左"呢個情況
胡禮菲臘斯肯定有人覺得24M貴
但車仔同老摩用得好佢
根本唔會理幾多錢買返黎

比著其他球隊, 都會有咁o既例子

[ Last edited by 熱刺#29戴維斯 on 2-10-2005 at 04:33 PM ]

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:30:25

Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-10-2 04:27 PM:


兩睇la
人地見到你係車仔wo,都有心抬高個價la

唔通見水魚唔屈番一筆,況且車仔都係買人d主將,個價一定高d:icon113:

熱刺#29戴維斯 發表於 2005-10-2 16:31:13

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-10-2 04:24 PM:


競爭性已經大大減低了,而且球隊平均質素下降,睇左場保頓真係悶死:icon061::icon061:
:o英超中型班以致中下游及護級份子之實力不及西意甲之相同球隊
已經唔係呢兩季的事

銀公主 發表於 2005-10-2 16:31:19

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-10-2 04:30 PM:


唔通見水魚唔屈番一筆,況且車仔都係買人d主將,個價一定高d:icon113:

所以唔怪得哂車仔

Carr 發表於 2005-10-2 16:35:50

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2005-10-2 04:28 PM:
From:古都

d英超真係好鬼廢
當我知道愛華頓上年拎第4
之後uefa比人炒
我就想笑

:icon101:
toffee響domestic league都唔係好好:icon113:

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:38:06

Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2005-10-2 04:31 PM:

:o英超中型班以致中下游及護級份子之實力不及西意甲之相同球隊
已經唔係呢兩季的事

工作證玩死英超中下游及護級份子,好多小國好球員都去唔到英超 (特別係南美的攻擊球員)我唔感話一定適應英超節奏同踢法,但係論基本技術一定好過而家d二打六 (例: -6, 奇雲 戴維斯個班廢柴)

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:39:55

Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2-10-05 04:31 PM:


所以唔怪得哂車仔

都係ge:icon075:

但如果唔係車仔咁肯"買乜人都使大$"同無乜買人策略的話..
車仔會無咁水魚ge..:icon101:
2睇la..

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:40:14

Originally posted by 熱刺#29戴維斯 at 2-10-05 04:28 PM:

千金難買心頭好呢個情況正正就係衍生自"買貴左"呢個情況
胡禮菲臘斯肯定有人覺得24M貴
但車仔同老摩用得好佢
根本唔會理幾多錢買返黎

比著其他球隊, 都會有咁o既例子

[ Last edited by 熱刺 ...

"買貴左"同"用得好,唔會理幾多錢"係2樣野..

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:40:18

Originally posted by 肥仔麟 at 2005-10-2 04:28 PM:
From:古都

d英超真係好鬼廢
當我知道愛華頓上年拎第4
之後uefa比人炒
我就想笑

:icon101:

當見下世面,有d似以前brand 5 學校考第四,出去會考得1-2分個種情況:icon117:

歐石南 發表於 2005-10-2 16:41:03

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-10-2 16:38:


工作證玩死英超中下游及護級份子,好多小國好球員都去唔到英超 (特別係南美的攻擊球員)我唔感話一定適應英超節奏同踢法,但係論基本技術一定好過而家d二打六 (例: -6, 奇雲 戴維斯個班廢柴)
呢個係國家政策
唔單係響足球:o

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:41:28

Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-10-2 04:40 PM:


"買貴左"同"用得好,唔會理幾多錢"係2樣野..

係3樣野:icon117:

HackerWong 發表於 2005-10-2 16:42:34

Originally posted by Donald at 2-10-05 04:40 PM:


當見下世面,有d似以前brand 5 學校考第四,出去會考得1-2分個種情況:icon117:

PL好多隊ge戰術同20年前ge無分別,無進步過...
競爭力自然低la.. :icon101:

Donald 發表於 2005-10-2 16:42:45

Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-10-2 04:41 PM:

呢個係國家政策
唔單係響足球:o

咁有d隊就真係要打死一世高q大棍羅。:(
頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9
查看完整版本: 呂大樂:英超悶場非一日之寒