論壇 › 世界足球版 › 愛華頓 vs 車路士

Hakkinen 發表於 2005-10-24 10:58:16

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:55:


佢羅車仔講我羅利記講之嘛:(
這個topic 是愛華頓 vs 車路士,樓上的可不要進錯topic啊 :icon101:

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 10:58:50

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 10:56:


win不了 可不等於 不夠運

但d場就係因為唔夠運所以win唔到
當然你可以話everton戰術有所發揮
但如果唔係個旁證:icon062:

Tung 發表於 2005-10-24 10:58:53

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:55 AM:


佢羅車仔講我羅利記講之嘛:(
別說Liverpool了~Liverpool今年也不好呢~

Hakkinen 發表於 2005-10-24 10:59:24

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:57:


我諗Moyes既目標最多都係1分羅
如果係3分 下半場再攻上去 分分鐘比車仔入多1~2球
要拎3分都要拎得醒目,不要連1分也丟掉,拿不到3分退而求次好了:o

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 10:59:50

Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 10:56:

勝利要拿來炫耀嗎 :(
金雕玉砌的足球隊我可看不起唷:o

如果你認為車仔只係=金雕玉砌的足球
我真冇野好講

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 11:00:25

Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 10:58:

這個topic 是愛華頓 vs 車路士,樓上的可不要進錯topic啊 :icon101:

咁你就唔好羅利記做example

Hakkinen 發表於 2005-10-24 11:00:30

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:58:


但d場就係因為唔夠運所以win唔到
當然你可以話everton戰術有所發揮
但如果唔係個旁證:icon062:
你要說到旁證球證嗎:o 他們也是人,你要他們的判斷永遠正確也是不能的:o

Tung 發表於 2005-10-24 11:00:33

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:57 AM:


我諗Moyes既目標最多都係1分羅
如果係3分 下半場再攻上去 分分鐘比車仔入多1~2球

Moyes賽前話佢目標係贏1 - 0....

再講3分target都唔一定要先主動攻上去~

Hakkinen 發表於 2005-10-24 11:01:06

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:00:


咁你就唔好羅利記做example
我話拎歐冠,你係要話利物浦我冇野好講 :icon101:

Hakkinen 發表於 2005-10-24 11:01:28

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:59:


如果你認為車仔只係=金雕玉砌的足球
我真冇野好講
油庫上建立的足球嗎 :icon101:

Tung 發表於 2005-10-24 11:03:03

Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 11:00 AM:

你要說到旁證球證嗎:o 他們也是人,你要他們的判斷永遠正確也是不能的:o
不~求fairness
球証都無吹Terry手球啦~

如果吹既話我會覺得係harsh decision.

但是古生個球真係offside...杜巴係吹雞之後shoot幾多球都唔計啦~

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 11:03:51

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:00:


Moyes賽前話佢目標係贏1 - 0....

再講3分target都唔一定要先主動攻上去~

下半場一比人攻就即係輸返球
之後都只有守既份 我唔信個時目標仲係3分羅

Tung 發表於 2005-10-24 11:04:02

Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 11:01 AM:

油庫上建立的足球嗎 :icon101:
只嘆時也命也~

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 11:04:58

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:03:

不~求fairness
球証都無吹Terry手球啦~

如果吹既話我會覺得係harsh decision.

但是古生個球真係offside...杜巴係吹雞之後shoot幾多球都唔計啦~

古生進攻都冇參與到 旁證要吹都唔應該吹古生啦
佢真係太過快舉旗...
手球個球...都係各有各睇啦

Tung 發表於 2005-10-24 11:05:02

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:03 AM:


下半場一比人攻就即係輸返球
之後都只有守既份 我唔信個時目標仲係3分羅
相信一隊波係未吹雞之前既目標都係贏~

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 11:05:26

Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 11:01:

油庫上建立的足球嗎 :icon101:

你要咁諗隨便你

Tung 發表於 2005-10-24 11:06:10

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:04 AM:


古生進攻都冇參與到 旁證要吹都唔應該吹古生啦
佢真係太過快舉旗...
手球個球...都係各有各睇啦
球証自己俾返credit 車仔lor咁當

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 11:06:44

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:06:

球証自己俾返credit 車仔lor咁當

邊有得咁當架
做假波咩:icon101:

Hakkinen 發表於 2005-10-24 11:07:05

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:03:


下半場一比人攻就即係輸返球
之後都只有守既份 我唔信個時目標仲係3分羅
要守得好才能向3分邁進,守不倒談不上入球啊:o
別未學行先學走好了:o

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-24 11:07:13

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:05:

相信一隊波係未吹雞之前既目標都係贏~

畢迪斯近兩場應該都係諗住唔好輸多球:icon101:

查看完整版本: 愛華頓 vs 車路士