Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:55: 佢羅車仔講我羅利記講之嘛
使用道具 舉報
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 10:56: win不了 可不等於 不夠運
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:55 AM: 佢羅車仔講我羅利記講之嘛
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:57: 我諗Moyes既目標最多都係1分羅 如果係3分 下半場再攻上去 分分鐘比車仔入多1~2球
Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 10:56: 勝利要拿來炫耀嗎 金雕玉砌的足球隊我可看不起唷
Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 10:58: 這個topic 是愛華頓 vs 車路士,樓上的可不要進錯topic啊
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:58: 但d場就係因為唔夠運所以win唔到 當然你可以話everton戰術有所發揮 但如果唔係個旁證
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:57 AM: 我諗Moyes既目標最多都係1分羅 如果係3分 下半場再攻上去 分分鐘比車仔入多1~2球
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:00: 咁你就唔好羅利記做example
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 10:59: 如果你認為車仔只係=金雕玉砌的足球 我真冇野好講
Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 11:00 AM: 你要說到旁證球證嗎 他們也是人,你要他們的判斷永遠正確也是不能的
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:00: Moyes賽前話佢目標係贏1 - 0.... 再講3分target都唔一定要先主動攻上去~
Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 11:01 AM: 油庫上建立的足球嗎
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:03: 不~求fairness 球証都無吹Terry手球啦~ 如果吹既話我會覺得係harsh decision. 但是古生個球真係offside...杜巴係吹雞之後shoot幾多球都唔計啦~
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:03 AM: 下半場一比人攻就即係輸返球 之後都只有守既份 我唔信個時目標仲係3分羅
Originally posted by Hakkinen at 2005-10-24 11:01: 油庫上建立的足球嗎
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:04 AM: 古生進攻都冇參與到 旁證要吹都唔應該吹古生啦 佢真係太過快舉旗... 手球個球...都係各有各睇啦
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:06: 球証自己俾返credit 車仔lor咁當
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-24 11:03: 下半場一比人攻就即係輸返球 之後都只有守既份 我唔信個時目標仲係3分羅
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 11:05: 相信一隊波係未吹雞之前既目標都係贏~
本版積分規則 發表回復 回帖並轉播 回帖後跳轉到最後一頁
Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|HKCM
GMT+8, 2026-9-14 17:51 , Processed in 0.032287 second(s), 14 queries .
Powered by Discuz! X3.5
© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.
IP卡
狗仔卡
發表於 2005-10-24 10:58:16
顯身å¡
發表於 2005-10-24 10:58:53
