論壇 › 世界足球版 › 愛華頓 vs 車路士

joekjen 發表於 2005-10-26 12:50:10

如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執

完

joekjen 發表於 2005-10-26 12:54:44

Originally posted by 傑夫仔 at 2005-10-26 11:55 AM:

我舉既係鬥獸棋既例子

大極生兩儀,兩儀生四象,四象生八卦
至剛至柔,大家互相剋制...


ot

互相剋制不代表雙方強弱有別,互相剋制的條件在於雙方有雙同的力量

Tung 發表於 2005-10-26 12:58:53

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 12:50 PM:
如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執

完
no...not only Chelsea..

target should be 3 points anyway in home game...

3 pts target =/= attackive style

joekjen 發表於 2005-10-26 13:02:32

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-26 12:58 PM:

no...not only Chelsea..

target should be 3 points anyway in home game...



我只係覺得奇怪,車路士成日做討論目標,好悶

點解唔講下hotspur,westham咁,佢地都打得好!

華頓 發表於 2005-10-26 13:05:18

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:02 PM:




我只係覺得奇怪,車路士成日做討論目標,好悶

點解唔講下hotspur,westham咁,佢地都打得好!
而家唔係單單討論緊車路士

joekjen 發表於 2005-10-26 13:11:55

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 01:05 PM:

而家唔係單單討論緊車路士


我冇睇再之前既post

我見最後幾版post都係講everton唔可能會贏到,車路士乜野乜野咁

華頓 發表於 2005-10-26 13:13:55

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 12:50 PM:
如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執

完
這只是你的個人感覺

華頓 發表於 2005-10-26 13:15:41

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:11 PM:



我冇睇再之前既post

我見最後幾版post都係講everton唔可能會贏到,車路士乜野乜野咁

討論討論je
有乜唔妥

joekjen 發表於 2005-10-26 13:16:10

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 01:13 PM:

這只是你的個人感覺


我就唔信而家如果係對west bromwich會吹到有20版:icon032:

joekjen 發表於 2005-10-26 13:16:52

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 01:15 PM:


討論討論je
有乜唔妥


我成日覺得而家一講車路士就會有爭執:o

華頓 發表於 2005-10-26 13:17:14

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:16 PM:



我就唔信而家如果係對west bromwich會吹到有20版:icon032:
=/=如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執

華頓 發表於 2005-10-26 13:20:32

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:16 PM:



我成日覺得而家一講車路士就會有爭執:o
我係以愛華頓的角度發言:o

話之你講緊車路士定西布朗

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-26 13:39:14

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 12:08:

everton:)

因為everton望win都唔係望呢場:)

i can't see anything from their performance that they wanna win in the 2nd half

klinskan 發表於 2005-10-26 13:42:43

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:16 PM:



我成日覺得而家一講車路士就會有爭執:o
因為有個版友一定仲入黎同你嘈一餐 ~!

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-26 13:48:56

Originally posted by klinskan at 2005-10-26 13:42:

因為有個版友一定仲入黎同你嘈一餐 ~!

u2 :icon032:

Tung 發表於 2005-10-26 14:16:25

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-26 01:39 PM:


i can't see anything from their performance that they wanna win in the 2nd half


simply~~counter attack

AirKID 發表於 2005-10-26 14:18:10

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-26 14:16:



simply~~counter attack

the main target is still 1 mark

Tung 發表於 2005-10-26 14:25:50

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-26 02:18 PM:


the main target is still 1 mark
i stop my arguing~~

finish~

捷克NeVeD子彈 發表於 2005-10-26 17:50:45

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 11:12 AM:

冇分係應該
一分係bonus
三分係神跡



講完:icon032:
你唔係莫耶斯,佢要幾多分你估佢唔到:icon032:

捷克NeVeD子彈 發表於 2005-10-26 17:52:59

Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 11:51 AM:


我冇話弱隊勝強唔可能出現


只係想講強勝弱係正常不過的事

而家就講到"弱必勝強",咁我就唔明弱和強係點解了

似乎冇人講過「弱必勝強」
但係有人覺得弱隊對強隊就抱住「一分政策」
弱隊打強隊就唔可以用三分黎做目標?
華頓之前問過,但冇人答:icon102:

查看完整版本: 愛華頓 vs 車路士