找回密碼
 會員申請
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
樓主: 華頓

愛華頓 vs 車路士

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2005-10-26 12:50:10 | 顯示全部樓層
如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 12:54:44 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by 傑夫仔 at 2005-10-26 11:55 AM:

我舉既係鬥獸棋既例子

大極生兩儀,兩儀生四象,四象生八卦
至剛至柔,大家互相剋制...



ot

互相剋制不代表雙方強弱有別,互相剋制的條件在於雙方有雙同的力量
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 12:58:53 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 12:50 PM:
如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執


no...not only Chelsea..

target should be 3 points anyway in home game...

3 pts target =/= attackive style
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 13:02:32 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-26 12:58 PM:

no...not only Chelsea..

target should be 3 points anyway in home game...




我只係覺得奇怪,車路士成日做討論目標,好悶

點解唔講下hotspur,westham咁,佢地都打得好!
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2005-10-26 13:05:18 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:02 PM:




我只係覺得奇怪,車路士成日做討論目標,好悶

點解唔講下hotspur,westham咁,佢地都打得好!

而家唔係單單討論緊車路士
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 13:11:55 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 01:05 PM:

而家唔係單單討論緊車路士



我冇睇再之前既post

我見最後幾版post都係講everton唔可能會贏到,車路士乜野乜野咁
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2005-10-26 13:13:55 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 12:50 PM:
如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執


這只是你的個人感覺
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2005-10-26 13:15:41 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:11 PM:



我冇睇再之前既post

我見最後幾版post都係講everton唔可能會贏到,車路士乜野乜野咁


討論討論je
有乜唔妥
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 13:16:10 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 01:13 PM:

這只是你的個人感覺



我就唔信而家如果係對west bromwich會吹到有20版
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 13:16:52 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 01:15 PM:


討論討論je
有乜唔妥



我成日覺得而家一講車路士就會有爭執
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2005-10-26 13:17:14 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:16 PM:



我就唔信而家如果係對west bromwich會吹到有20版

=/=如果而家對緊果隊唔係車路士就唔會有爭執
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2005-10-26 13:20:32 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:16 PM:



我成日覺得而家一講車路士就會有爭執

我係以愛華頓的角度發言

話之你講緊車路士定西布朗
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 13:39:14 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 12:08:

everton

因為everton望win都唔係望呢場


i can't see anything from their performance that they wanna win in the 2nd half
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 13:42:43 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 01:16 PM:



我成日覺得而家一講車路士就會有爭執

因為有個版友一定仲入黎同你嘈一餐 ~!
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 13:48:56 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by klinskan at 2005-10-26 13:42:

因為有個版友一定仲入黎同你嘈一餐 ~!


u2
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 14:16:25 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-26 01:39 PM:


i can't see anything from their performance that they wanna win in the 2nd half



simply~~counter attack
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 14:18:10 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-26 14:16:



simply~~counter attack


the main target is still 1 mark
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 14:25:50 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-10-26 02:18 PM:


the main target is still 1 mark

i stop my arguing~~

finish~
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 17:50:45 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-26 11:12 AM:

冇分係應該
一分係bonus
三分係神跡



講完

你唔係莫耶斯,佢要幾多分你估佢唔到
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2005-10-26 17:52:59 | 顯示全部樓層
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-10-26 11:51 AM:


我冇話弱隊勝強唔可能出現


只係想講強勝弱係正常不過的事

而家就講到"弱必勝強",咁我就唔明弱和強係點解了


似乎冇人講過「弱必勝強」
但係有人覺得弱隊對強隊就抱住「一分政策」
弱隊打強隊就唔可以用三分黎做目標?
華頓之前問過,但冇人答
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|HKCM

GMT+8, 2026-9-7 04:18 , Processed in 0.029013 second(s), 13 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表