紐卡素的前路

Donald

很好的題目!!
後防方面,巴生的力量形打法對英超中下游都會好有用,所以上兩場都打得好好
同意樓主所講,曉士本身周身力無張利,打後備可能係最好.

反而我真係好想睇下泰萊打中堅,睇過佢幾場波,每場都有進步,防守夠狼而準,而且身材高大,相信在今季較後時間,可以比佢同保桑拍下,為未來鋪路.

中場方面,我始終認為差一隻有個人突破力的右翼,基本上,以往紐記的進攻往往由兩邊去波,而攻力亦相當有保證,相對今年的情況,左邊robert仔的壯態下滑,右邊無論係戴亞或米拿打都冇料到,沒有了兩邊的攻勢,我們的攻力當然大打折扣......

華頓

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-1-9 03:55 AM:
下半場.

而桑拿士又好似試緊4-5-1,但其實係唔係佢前線冇人可用先局打單箭頭呢?要知道4-5-1唔係容易掌握o既陣式,尤其有戴亞同保耶呢D"智慧型" o既 "天才".

當然la.........

阿忠

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-1-9 12:33 PM:


當然la.........

用戰術遷就球員其實冇乜問題

紐記其實都o岩踢4-5-1

古維特其實可以試下踢攻中

講野無point的人

Originally posted by 阿忠 at 2005-1-9 01:06 PM:


用戰術遷就球員其實冇乜問題

紐記其實都o岩踢4-5-1

古維特其實可以試下踢攻中

當年艾禾卡特曾經因為要讓位給雲尼斯杜萊
而擺古華特踢攻中(類似以前柏金果隻)
結果.........

阿忠

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-1-9 01:36 PM:

當年艾禾卡特曾經因為要讓位給雲尼斯杜萊
而擺古華特踢攻中(類似以前柏金果隻)
結果.........

我都記得佢試過...

但古維特其實真係有能力勝任攻中.....

佢交波真係唔錯

PENNYDIOR

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-1-9 03:58 AM:
有創造力o既中場..........維亞拿???

其實維亞拿係唔係唔適合踢英超呢?體能上適應唔到?佢之前都唔係完全冇機會,不過佢真係打唔出身價.

PENNYDIOR

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-1-9 12:18 PM:
很好的題目!!
後防方面,巴生的力量形打法對英超中下游都會好有用,所以上兩場都打得好好
同意樓主所講,曉士本身周身力無張利,打後備可能係最好.

反而我真係好想睇下泰萊打中堅,睇過佢幾場波,每場都 ...

其實我覺得幾怪,本身曉士係右閘,泰萊打中堅,但係宜家場場都用泰萊打右閘,曉士打中堅,係唔係信唔過泰萊呢個後生仔,驚佢o係中路犯錯失波呢?

PENNYDIOR

Originally posted by 阿忠 at 2005-1-9 02:18 PM:


我都記得佢試過...

但古維特其實真係有能力勝任攻中.....

佢交波真係唔錯

我意見係,古華特只可以係一個識二傳o既箭頭,佢交波真係好,不過佢冇o個種組織攻勢o既能力.而且,只要佢改善佢埋門o既功夫,佢絕對係一個好恐怖o既箭頭,打攻中反而埋沒o左佢o係最前線o既威力.

Donald

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-1-9 02:53 PM:


我意見係,古華特只可以係一個識二傳o既箭頭,佢交波真係好,不過佢冇o個種組織攻勢o既能力.而且,只要佢改善佢埋門o既功夫,佢絕對係一個好恐怖o既箭頭,打攻中反而埋沒o左佢o係最前線o既威力.

不過我覺得佢在前線的走動同搶點未夠積極.

Zero

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-1-9 02:49 PM:


其實我覺得幾怪,本身曉士係右閘,泰萊打中堅,但係宜家場場都用泰萊打右閘,曉士打中堅,係唔係信唔過泰萊呢個後生仔,驚佢o係中路犯錯失波呢?

無錯,佢認為Taylor係右閘犯錯都有人補救,
係中堅犯錯就會失波
所以想佢係右閘吸收經驗先


我可以接受呢個解釋

Zero

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-1-9 02:53 PM:


我意見係,古華特只可以係一個識二傳o既箭頭,佢交波真係好,不過佢冇o個種組織攻勢o既能力.而且,只要佢改善佢埋門o既功夫,佢絕對係一個好恐怖o既箭頭,打攻中反而埋沒o左佢o係最前線o既威力.

同意,佢唔係Bergkamp.....


其實佢身體同top fit既時候仲有一段距離......

Zero

Originally posted by PENNYDIOR at 2005-1-9 03:55 AM:
下半場.

由紐記o既進攻講起啦.

其實,我地o既最前線兵力唔錯,可以話各有所長.

舒利亞,唔駛我多講,英格蘭第一號射手(直至現時我都覺得係.)雖然體能日漸衰退,但係射術,頭球仍然係一流水準,而且近年二傳越來 ...

Bellamy既命運絕對同紐卡素既陣式有關
佢唔可以係單戰頭,一定唔可以,頭槌輸曬都似.....
所以如果係4-5-1佢一定係右翼

which is我覺得佢應該可以勝任呢個位置

同理,Viana都係,中場打兩個佢都係死硬
但如果係4-5-1,佢後面有Butt同Jenas做防守工作
佢就可以全面負責playmaker
指揮左面既Robert,右面既Bellamy/Dyer/Bowyer,前面既Kluivert/Shearer/Ameobi同後上既Jenas

咁既話紐卡素既攻力一定番曬黎.


中前場其實唔使買人
左面有N'Zogbia做Cover,必要時可以試下做埋Playmaker
右面同後備射手有Milner
Butt,Jenas,Bowyer打後腰,
Dyer就賣走算啦
再唔係我覺得可以試下Brittain.


Souness,你如果識用班人+處理好球員關係
紐卡素會係曼聯之下?

Donald

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-9 04:50 PM:


Bellamy既命運絕對同紐卡素既陣式有關
佢唔可以係單戰頭,一定唔可以,頭槌輸曬都似.....
所以如果係4-5-1佢一定係右翼

which is我覺得佢應該可以勝任呢個位置

同理,Viana都係,中場打兩個佢都係死硬
...

我就對維亞拿有d保留,始終佢加盟以來一直跟唔到球隊的節奏,的而且確,佢的創造力係係唔錯的(冠絕紐卡素吧),但我始終應為佢一定要改變自己的打法去配合英超的打法,出腳傳波都要快d同實際d,因為在英超的中場上,大慢同大柔的教炮手都好難生存。

至於4-5-1同4-4-2之間的抉擇,好大程度取決桑生的喜好,不過,球隊的合作性同機動性是首要改善的項目.

Zero

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-1-9 05:57 PM:


我就對維亞拿有d保留,始終佢加盟以來一直跟唔到球隊的節奏,的而且確,佢的創造力係係唔錯的(冠絕紐卡素吧),但我始終應為佢一定要改變自己的打法去配合英超的打法,出腳傳波都要快d同實際d,因為在英超的中場上, ...

要成為一流球隊,爭奪歐洲錦標,
Viana係必須既

試問有邊隊歐洲列強係無教炮手既?

Jenas,Butt,Bowyer既存在價值就係為Viana爭取空間
而且我唔認為Viana無進步過

佢欠缺既係信心

食脾細路

我想講講.......

今年Viana係葡有超異常,今日ge佢係做到呢d野...........


昨日又win了.............
http://www.sporting.pt/Info/Fute ... ro_080105_18093.asp
http://www.sporting.pt/Info/Fute ... gaClassificacao.asp

食脾細路

Originally posted by Zero at 2005-1-9 06:13 PM:


要成為一流球隊,爭奪歐洲錦標,
Viana係必須既

試問有邊隊歐洲列強係無教炮手既?

Jenas,Butt,Bowyer既存在價值就係為Viana爭取空間
而且我唔認為Viana無進步過

佢欠缺既係信心

佢番葡超半年..........
有d人話佢超越左Deco tim.............

食脾細路

Originally posted by Donald at 2005-1-9 05:57 PM:


我就對維亞拿有d保留,始終佢加盟以來一直跟唔到球隊的節奏,的而且確,佢的創造力係係唔錯的(冠絕紐卡素吧),但我始終應為佢一定要改變自己的打法去配合英超的打法,出腳傳波都要快d同實際d,因為在英超的中場上, ...

4-4-2下Viana這樣的中場的確是不可能生存
但4-5-1又卻是另一回事了,
更何況他近日已經證明了他真正的力量

畢爾包

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-1-9 12:33 PM:


當然la.........

when our toffee enjoys the success, other teams try to use it.
i think 2 forwards is better than a singal in newcastle case. bellamy+shearer is a powerful pair. kluvert is slow but his setting is nice. ameobi is a speedy forward and helps much when facing teams which their defenders are not a speedy one.
newcastle is good at playing aggressive football, 1 forward will waste their ability and discloses their weakness.

Zero

Originally posted by 畢爾包 at 2005-1-9 06:58 PM:

when our toffee enjoys the success, other teams try to use it.
i think 2 forwards is better than a singal in newcastle case. bellamy+shearer is a powerful pair. kluvert is slow but his setting  ...

well....4-5-1 can be very aggressive also....

actually the main point is,4-4-2 requires top-level wingers,
while Newcastle just have Robert only......

Jenas also played very bad in 4-4-2

畢爾包

shearer is old, he cannot be that 1 for 90mins.
kluivert is a setter rather than a forward like shearer.