歷史上入場人數最少的世界盃決賽週

AirKID

Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-10-14 18:55:
亞洲無強隊?
南韓同日本在02wc的表現叫咩
伊朗唔強?
伊拉克都唔弱啊
巴林班波唔係差架

02WC特別唔同 不能作準

Sol_Campbell

Originally posted by fc at 2005-10-14 05:08 PM:

好心勸你一句，咪再信李天命講，遲早害死你，好明顯佢自己唔識咩係logic．

純粹好奇
點解咁講既

Akwun

only a game simulation..no need to relate it to reality

Akwun

Other than population, culture and their interest in soccer is also very important..

ivansclo

Originally posted by fc at 15-10-2005 02:58 PM:
Tiring.

見到有d人好醒，識問人個basis係咩，有ｄ人冇basis有唔講自己ｄ basis又話人錯，我起碼會講我ｄ　basis. 你只可以唔同意呢ｄ　basis，但唔可以話人ｄ basis 錯，重要得把口．不過，有幾個quo ...

好難想像有人可以咁厚顏 ... 自己錯漏百出仲講到自己好似好有point ...

我既 basis 已經講過 n 次 ... 無謂再多講 ...某人 turn a blind eye 我都冇計 ...

我自問對 logic 既認識唔深, 唔講中文解釋係因為我唔知 fallacy of denying the antecedent既中文名係點 ... 但係一個 quote 出"Logic就係＝＞方向對時，相反＜＝時就不一定對"呢度唔知佢想講咩 ... 可能是外星語":icon088:，重有其他rules，唔教啦．", 又話李天命博士唔識 logic既人, 會唔明呢個 fallacy 係咩 ... 未免有點問題 ... (順帶一題:如果某人想知呢樣係咩 ... 可以買本中六 econ 既 microeconomic 教科書既 methodology一課 ... 入面有詳細解釋 ... )

另外, 有一樣野睇完真係想笑 ... ... 某人竟然將自己代入我例子度 ... 令我即刻諗到個笑話, 以助一笑: "某日, 甲開玩笑, 話乙好似一隻傻蛋 ...乙即刻嚴肅地反駁: 我唔係傻蛋!!!阿媽話我係胎生既, 唔係卵生既 ...你可以叫我鈍胎, 但係唔可以叫我傻蛋!!"

算啦 .... 明眼人都睇到誰是誰非 ... 某人都落荒而逃, 我都無謂再窮追猛打 ...

仲有, 睇番最早既post既朋友都知, 係邊個先撩者x同先 off topic ...否則我都唔使用咁多字去 defend myself and knock out those stupid posts ...

ivansclo

Originally posted by Akwun at 16-10-2005 11:03 AM:
Other than population, culture and their interest in soccer is also very important..

同意 ...

anthony920

係咪決賽係d廢隊對疊, 無人睇

Reina Tanaka

Originally posted by anthony920 at 2005-10-17 22:38:
係咪決賽係d廢隊對疊, 無人睇

o係 canada
就算英格蘭入決賽都唔會有乜人睇...................

Jurgen

just a game有咩好嘈
巴林win阿根廷都係game黎o者
不過足球ge野邊個會估到ar
好似睇返今次world cup非洲邊幾隊出線都知la
d強隊都冇曬

fc

Originally posted by ivansclo at 17-10-2005 02:10 PM:

我既 basis 已經講過 n 次 ... 無謂再多講 ...某人 turn a blind eye 我都冇計 ...

I was talking others who had not grounds and substantiation on this point but not you. Don't too sensitive.

我自問對 logic 既認識唔深, 唔講中文解釋係因 ...

I recommend you to read the "Logic" in Pure Maths of A-Level also. It did teach "Logic" in many years ago but I don't know whether it still exist in the current syllabus. It will tell you what is "If", "=>" and "<=" and how to use.More complicated than what you learnt in Econ.

落荒而逃, 我都無謂再窮追猛打 ...

Contradiction. Obvious you did. I just want to have a break to do other meaningful things and try to avoid the fire being spread and wasting time. In many your post, you quite like to humiliate person. Please keep your manner.

仲有, 睇番最早既post既朋友都知, 係邊個先撩者x同先 off topic ...

If you were angry about my first unpolite reply, OK, I say sorry to you. 都係咁有d火. However, who start the real fire to to humiliate person first? Check the post. I only start a question first.

Hope a "sorry" can keep you calm. Forgiveness needs great brave and only real man can do it. I forgave those you trepassing me but I hope you can do the same.

choy991044

強者不一定勝
但勝者一定強  

ivansclo

Originally posted by fc at 21-10-2005 06:15 PM:

I was talking others who had not grounds and substantiation on this point but not you. Don't too sensitive.


I recommend you to read the "Logic" in Pure Maths of A-Level al ...

仲以為你唔會再答 ...

坦白講,我都幾佩服你 .... 我既logic知識真少 ... 所以從未敢學你講要教人 ... 不過, 連我咁無知既人都知既logic (fallacy of denying the antecedent), 你咁高深莫測, 比李天命博士更高更強既人都未聽過 ... 可能係你勁人善忘掛 ... 我無法理解 ...

係 ... 我真係好無禮 ... 我唔應該直接指正你既錯誤 ... 我應該用例子 (如果你唔當真既話), 唔好令你咁難堪, 感到被 humiliated ... 向你講句 sorry ...

我知到自己冇 point 但被人踢爆係好難受 ... 我以前都試過 ... 所以你不用太介意 ... 深表同情 ...

希望仲可以見到你繼續 post 野, 有機會再討論, okay?

fc

Originally posted by ivansclo at 24-10-2005 01:59 PM:



仲以為你唔會再答 ...

坦白講,我都幾佩服你 .... 我既logic知識真少 ... 所以從未敢學你講要教人 ... 不過, 連我咁無知既人都知既logic (fallacy of denying the antecedent), 你咁高深莫測,  ...

It is not related to my knowlegde of Logic. If you know, all good economist especially on micro economic shall have a good knowledge of Math. If you talking about Logic, I believe Dr. Lee Tin Ming shall have studied not only the theory but also Math's Logic. If you have studied it, it will become easy to explain whenever you put all things to be quantitified and calculated (it all related to "Set" and "Subset" ) . "Fallacy" is a name used to give on a theory only. The essence of "Logic" request practical and usage.

Points. I have many and can hit back to make you embrass. But I really don't argue with you any more because I don't spread the hate and waste too much time. I hope it would make the world better. Furthermore, what you quoted the words from Dr. Lee have problems itself in the sense of Logic so it made me strange. Check it if you claim that you have not little knowledge on Logic otherwise I can tell you (it also related to "Set" and "Subset" ) .

By the way, I accept your apology. Hope you and me can face the problems positive and keep manner all the time.

P.S.: All great economists start from mathematics.

[ Last edited by fc on 24-10-2005 at 02:32 PM ]