原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:44 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
I didn't have a clear view
But commentator commented it as 'reckless tackle'
個勢係猛, 但明顯向波
咁樣俾牌水準不一貫
下半場發展其實合理D
曼聯中場根本唔強 ,仲打2MC ,車仔咁都輸就太7
原帖由 water_long 於 2009-8-911:44 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
點解總係覺得杜奧巴呢場係amc....:icon102:
A complete forward position I would say :icon101:
原帖由 alan_given 於 2009-8-911:41 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
英超夠殺
歐聯:(
原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-911:46 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
個勢係猛, 但明顯向波
咁樣俾牌水準不一貫
reckless = out of his mind
maybe because of his intentions
原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-911:44 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
你睇下車路士幾平靜
因為對手唔係Barca ....
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-923:44 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
I didn't have a clear view
But commentator commented it as 'reckless tackle'
有報復成份
同時係波叻甩波在先
艾夫拿"好硬淨咁"連波帶腳飛埋去
原帖由 klinskan 於 2009-8-911:40 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
得益啊嘛
朗肥自己控住波 又要去
關人鬼事~
球證冇打得益手勢
波歷克訓低個下都唔係犯規架
吹完之後球證要保辛華踢番個波俾曼聯
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:46 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
A complete forward position I would say :icon101:
Jarque topic need your opinion on systolic heart failure :(
原帖由 garyi 於 2009-8-923:47 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
球證冇打得益手勢
波歷克訓低個下都唔係犯規架
吹完之後球證要保辛華踢番個波俾曼聯
所以話好似有雙重標準
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:47 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
reckless = out of his mind
maybe because of his intentions
咁我重覆
以後艾華唔可以鏟波勒?
intention明顯向波, 如果要報復, 駛乜踢個波?
原帖由 garyi 於 2009-8-911:47 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
球證冇打得益手勢
波歷克訓低個下都唔係犯規架
吹完之後球證要保辛華踢番個波俾曼聯
Ballack fell down when Chelsea was defending so play should stop
Evra fell down when Man Utd was attacking so play on could be given
原帖由 FlyingDonkey 於 2009-8-911:47 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Jarque topic need your opinion on systolic heart failure :(
Congenital defect i guess
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:49 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Ballack fell down when Chelsea was defending so play should stop
Evra fell down when Man Utd was attacking so play on could be given
進攻不應享有同樣權利?
原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-911:49 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
咁我重覆
以後艾華唔可以鏟波勒?
intention明顯向波, 如果要報復, 駛乜踢個波?
From what i saw, i didn't think he was going for the ball at all
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:50 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
Congenital defect i guess
an undiagnosed CHD?
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:49 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Ballack fell down when Chelsea was defending so play should stop
Evra fell down when Man Utd was attacking so play on could be given
:icon075:
同埋球證唔一定要打得益手勢
只要唔吹雞比賽就係繼續架啦
變番442 ,曼聯中場真係現形
百無禁忌拉落半格甚至一格 ,威力可能仲大
今日起太前 ,但支援又唔算多
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:51 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
From what i saw, i didn't think he was going for the ball at all
咁艾華係波勒冇退讓嘅情況下踢到波係巧合?
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-923:51 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
From what i saw, i didn't think he was going for the ball at all
但佢中波喎...