Keith 發表於 2009-8-9 23:46:00

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:44 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


I didn't have a clear view
But commentator commented it as 'reckless tackle'
個勢係猛, 但明顯向波
咁樣俾牌水準不一貫

TAMTOM 發表於 2009-8-9 23:46:27

下半場發展其實合理D
曼聯中場根本唔強 ,仲打2MC ,車仔咁都輸就太7

奇連士文再生 發表於 2009-8-9 23:46:32

原帖由 water_long 於 2009-8-911:44 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
點解總係覺得杜奧巴呢場係amc....:icon102:

A complete forward position I would say :icon101:

FlyingDonkey 發表於 2009-8-9 23:46:47

原帖由 alan_given 於 2009-8-911:41 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif


英超夠殺
歐聯:(

奇連士文再生 發表於 2009-8-9 23:47:26

原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-911:46 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

個勢係猛, 但明顯向波
咁樣俾牌水準不一貫

reckless = out of his mind
maybe because of his intentions

AH B 發表於 2009-8-9 23:47:38

原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-911:44 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


你睇下車路士幾平靜
因為對手唔係Barca ....

孫中謝拉特.奧雲 發表於 2009-8-9 23:47:38

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-923:44 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


I didn't have a clear view
But commentator commented it as 'reckless tackle'
有報復成份
同時係波叻甩波在先
艾夫拿"好硬淨咁"連波帶腳飛埋去

garyi 發表於 2009-8-9 23:47:38

原帖由 klinskan 於 2009-8-911:40 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


得益啊嘛
朗肥自己控住波 又要去

關人鬼事~
球證冇打得益手勢

波歷克訓低個下都唔係犯規架
吹完之後球證要保辛華踢番個波俾曼聯

FlyingDonkey 發表於 2009-8-9 23:47:56

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:46 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif


A complete forward position I would say :icon101:
Jarque topic need your opinion on systolic heart failure :(

孫中謝拉特.奧雲 發表於 2009-8-9 23:48:20

原帖由 garyi 於 2009-8-923:47 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

球證冇打得益手勢

波歷克訓低個下都唔係犯規架
吹完之後球證要保辛華踢番個波俾曼聯
所以話好似有雙重標準

Keith 發表於 2009-8-9 23:49:13

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:47 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


reckless = out of his mind
maybe because of his intentions
咁我重覆
以後艾華唔可以鏟波勒?
intention明顯向波, 如果要報復, 駛乜踢個波?

奇連士文再生 發表於 2009-8-9 23:49:16

原帖由 garyi 於 2009-8-911:47 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

球證冇打得益手勢

波歷克訓低個下都唔係犯規架
吹完之後球證要保辛華踢番個波俾曼聯

Ballack fell down when Chelsea was defending so play should stop
Evra fell down when Man Utd was attacking so play on could be given

奇連士文再生 發表於 2009-8-9 23:50:26

原帖由 FlyingDonkey 於 2009-8-911:47 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

Jarque topic need your opinion on systolic heart failure :(

Congenital defect i guess

Keith 發表於 2009-8-9 23:51:06

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:49 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


Ballack fell down when Chelsea was defending so play should stop
Evra fell down when Man Utd was attacking so play on could be given
進攻不應享有同樣權利?

奇連士文再生 發表於 2009-8-9 23:51:19

原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-911:49 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif

咁我重覆
以後艾華唔可以鏟波勒?
intention明顯向波, 如果要報復, 駛乜踢個波?

From what i saw, i didn't think he was going for the ball at all

FlyingDonkey 發表於 2009-8-9 23:51:21

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:50 PM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif


Congenital defect i guess
an undiagnosed CHD?

alan_given 發表於 2009-8-9 23:51:57

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:49 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


Ballack fell down when Chelsea was defending so play should stop
Evra fell down when Man Utd was attacking so play on could be given

:icon075:
同埋球證唔一定要打得益手勢
只要唔吹雞比賽就係繼續架啦

TAMTOM 發表於 2009-8-9 23:52:27

變番442 ,曼聯中場真係現形
百無禁忌拉落半格甚至一格 ,威力可能仲大
今日起太前 ,但支援又唔算多

Keith 發表於 2009-8-9 23:52:30

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-911:51 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


From what i saw, i didn't think he was going for the ball at all
咁艾華係波勒冇退讓嘅情況下踢到波係巧合?

孫中謝拉特.奧雲 發表於 2009-8-9 23:52:32

原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-923:51 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif


From what i saw, i didn't think he was going for the ball at all
但佢中波喎...
頁: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
查看完整版本: 09社區盾------曼聯vs車路士