原帖由 捷禾@Ajax 於 2009-8-911:59 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Foster 如果win o左費蛇下場用古斯錫定佢? :icon101:
古斯錫...因為下場唔會有互射pk
原帖由 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 於 2009-8-1012:01 AM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
呢個要
但艾夫拿係咪雙腳飛先?
唔好偷換概念bor
Seems a two-legged one wor
車仔win o左佢啦下場唔駛見到Foster :icon101:
原帖由 TZZero 於 2009-8-1012:01 AM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
咁同 james 有咩分別 :icon110:
唔怪得今次 capello 唔要 james :icon101:
:icon125:
James is better :icon101:
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-1000:02 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Seems a two-legged one wor
given既意思係two foot challenge
明顯地艾夫拿係單腳飛落去先 , 第隻腳再跟住到
原帖由 alan_given 於 2009-8-911:59 PM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
雙腳跳遠式剷波如果中左波...咁係咪都叫中波, 但係咪都應該要俾牌呢
艾華個腳係唔係雙腳跳遠?
明明波勒離咗腳, 唔通唔俾搶佢波?
原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-1000:03 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
艾華個腳係唔係雙腳跳遠?
明明波勒離咗腳, 唔通唔俾搶佢波?
that's the point
係咪連續3季pk戰?
原帖由 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 於 2009-8-1012:01 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
呢個要
但艾夫拿係咪雙腳飛先?
唔好偷換概念bor
我只係想講, 如果球證覺得佢去勢唔好就可以俾牌, 而唔係因為有冇中波而決定俾唔俾
原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-1012:01 AM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
即係個頭唔會有事?
Evra wasn't hit on the head right?
艾夫拿:icon101: :icon101:
pathetic pk by evra
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-1012:04 AM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Evra wasn't hit on the head right?
爭頭向面
poor pk by giggs and evra
艾夫蘭呢下係傳波嗎?
Evra 同Cech 練緊十二碼/真係咁憎Foster? :icon101:
曼聯又搵D乜人黎射啊...:icon101: :icon101: :icon101: :icon101: :icon101:
原帖由 alan_given 於 2009-8-1000:04 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
我只係想講, 如果球證覺得佢去勢唔好就可以俾牌, 而唔係因為有冇中波而決定俾唔俾
佢去勢唔係唔好 , 我重申
佢係有個心去報復 , 但個tackle並唔係一個值得比牌既攔截
beautiful pk by kalou
such a difference :icon101:
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-1000:04 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Evra wasn't hit on the head right?
慢鏡顯示波叻開爭中頭