原帖由 捷禾@Ajax 於 2009-8-1012:05 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Evra 同Cech 練緊十二碼/真係咁憎Foster? :icon101:
睇黎班友好憎Foster:icon101: ....
原帖由 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 於 2009-8-923:58 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
沙比都賣埋 , 你想我點?
這不是人腳的問題
原帖由 klinskan 於 2009-8-1000:05 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
艾夫蘭呢下係傳波嗎?
似係:icon101:
原帖由 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 於 2009-8-911:59 PM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
曲到圓喎師傅:icon101:
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-1012:00 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
What is on about with you :icon101:
原帖由 giggs903 於 2009-8-1012:01 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
今季玩曲??:icon101: :icon101: :icon101:
冇波睇,求其搵d野up下:icon101:
不過邪盾求其啦:icon101:
拿唔到都冇壞:icon101:
而且頭幾場熱身賽太順,早d撞下牆好過:icon101:
原帖由 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 於 2009-8-1012:06 AM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
佢去勢唔係唔好 , 我重申
佢係有個心去報復 , 但個tackle並唔係一個值得比牌既攔截
有心報復, 唔等去攔截有問題喎
原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2009-8-1000:06 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
這不是人腳的問題
好了
我得承認我愛奧雲多於謝拉特:icon101:
點解一個黃牌會咁值得討論 :icon101:
原帖由 孫中謝拉特.奧雲 於 2009-8-1012:06 AM 發表 http://hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
慢鏡顯示波叻開爭中頭
Oh, I take back what i say then
But still, I am standing on the point that man utd had the immediate right to stop play while chelsea didn't, and that man utd are themselves to blame for the 2nd goal
原帖由 Keith 於 2009-8-1000:06 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
有心報復, 唔等去攔截有問題喎
冇錯
我唔覺得果腳攔截係值得吹
但佢明顯有報復心態就可以吹
你揾OWEN, ROONEY, SCHOLES都合理D:icon102:
原帖由 water_long 於 2009-8-1012:06 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
睇黎班友好憎Foster:icon101: ....
實在認同:icon101:
67 益觀眾 ,知道贏硬 ,比觀眾睇埋PK
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-1012:06 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
beautiful pk by kalou
such a difference :icon101:
繼續撐Kalou打前鋒:icon083:
原帖由 Gianni Rivera 於 2009-8-1012:08 AM 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
你揾OWEN, ROONEY, SCHOLES都合理D:icon102:
owen 十二碼命中 得3成
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-1012:08 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Oh, I take back what i say then
But still, I am standing on the point that man utd had the immediate right to stop play while chelsea didn't, and that man utd are themselves to blame for the 2nd goa ...
But first of all I think Ballack should be sent off if Evra should be cautioned.
原帖由 奇連士文再生 於 2009-8-1000:08 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
Oh, I take back what i say then
But still, I am standing on the point that man utd had the immediate right to stop play while chelsea didn't, and that man utd are themselves to blame for the 2nd goa ...
我一直討論緊既唔係曼聯主動去攻
而係波叻倒地 , 球証主動吹停 , 艾夫拿倒地 , 球証由佢
點會咁先
如果波叻係因為球証覺得受傷嚴重要立時吹停既 , 咁點解唔吹停埋艾夫拿果球呢
原帖由 henrytam 於 2009-8-1000:09 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
繼續撐Kalou打前鋒:icon083:
去阿仙奴有正選:icon101:
原帖由 henrytam 於 2009-8-1012:02 AM 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
明明係曼聯有鬥心有後勁:D
送你上十架先:icon072:
原帖由 choy991044 於 2009-8-1000:07 發表 http://hkcm.hkehost.net/images/common/back.gif
點解一個黃牌會咁值得討論 :icon101:
因為同manutd有關:icon101:
原帖由 choy991044 於 2009-8-1000:07 發表 http://www.hkcmforum.com/images/common/back.gif
點解一個黃牌會咁值得討論 :icon101:
太耐冇波睇
要搵d野吹下水:icon101: