我都想講講
DMC響EPL甚至成個現金聯賽好重要
EPL中間多數用mc+DMC or DMC+DMC
以我既Spurs為例
Davids黎左真係成隊唔同左
Carrick除左防守外, attacking佢都要參與
La Liga同EPL, 邊個守得好d?
我會話EPL law
我睇少睇la liga, 不過一睇就見到好多poor defence
但係DMC質素就差唔多
ps Spain d球場大d
Originally posted by Carr at 2005-11-6 04:49:
我都想講講
DMC響EPL甚至成個現金聯賽好重要
EPL中間多數用mc+DMC or DMC+DMC
以我既Spurs為例
Davids黎左真係成隊唔同左
Carrick除左防守外, attacking佢都要參與
La Liga同EPL, 邊個守得好d?
我會話EP ...
算吧,再談這 topic 初段提及的攻守觀感問題是多餘的..
55頁都唔係科蘭了 :icon101:
Originally posted by 陳星龍 at 2005-11-6 05:26:
55頁都唔係科蘭了 :icon101:
由第一頁末段開始..:icon101:
睇完喇
我都手痕tim...
Originally posted by stephenlion at 6-11-05 04:48 PM:
睇完喇
我都手痕tim...
go ahead then.
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-11-6 16:53:
go ahead then.
我敢話
india既足球勁過spain~
Originally posted by stephenlion at 6-11-05 05:30 PM:
我敢話
india既足球勁過spain~
o甘惡??:eek:
理由? :icon032:
追左50頁POST
車版友經常話西班牙在大賽無表現,英格蘭係WC冠軍(只此一次:icon112:仲要主場之利:icon112:)
咁我想問,88EURO邊隊波俾雲巴士頓玩死,94WC英格蘭去左邊??
球員要有盃先成功,仲要係大盃?
咁朗尼,林伯特都唔成功者:icon112:
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-11-6 09:11 PM:
追左50頁POST
車版友經常話西班牙在大賽無表現,英格蘭係WC冠軍(只此一次:icon112:仲要主場之利:icon112:)
咁我想問,88EURO邊隊波俾雲巴士頓玩死,94WC英格蘭去左邊??
球員要有盃先成功,仲要係大盃?
咁朗尼,林伯 ...
算la,佢又會再講一堆data話英格蘭點比西班牙好
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-11-6 21:11:
追左50頁POST
車版友經常話西班牙在大賽無表現,英格蘭係WC冠軍(只此一次:icon112:仲要主場之利:icon112:)
咁我想問,88EURO邊隊波俾雲巴士頓玩死,94WC英格蘭去左邊??
球員要有盃先成功,仲要係大盃?
咁朗尼,林伯 ...
咁英國點都算係羅到WC
唔可以咁計既:icon101:
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-11-6 09:21 PM:
咁英國點都算係羅到WC
唔可以咁計既:icon101:
如果咁計,希臘同丹麥在足球史上的功勞(功德?功績?總之差不多的詞意啦:icon101:)比得上英格蘭,荷蘭,意大利同德國
因為有記錄嘛:icon101:(我認為04希臘是防守足球的極致,但戰術上的新意不足)
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-11-6 21:37:
如果咁計,希臘同丹麥在足球史上的功勞(功德?功績?總之差不多的詞意啦:icon101:)比得上英格蘭,荷蘭,意大利同德國
因為有記錄嘛:icon101:(我認為04希臘是防守足球的極致,但戰術上的新意不足)
greece既戰術冇進取性可言 一味既防守反擊係對住主攻or壓力大既球隊先有用
所以WC06都冇佢份
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 6-11-05 09:37 PM:
如果咁計,希臘同丹麥在足球史上的功勞(功德?功績?總之差不多的詞意啦:icon101:)比得上英格蘭,荷蘭,意大利同德國
因為有記錄嘛:icon101:(我認為04希臘是防守足球的極致,但戰術上的新意不足)
唔係ar ma? :eek:
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-11-6 19:40:
o甘惡??:eek:
理由? :icon032:
佢講hollywood影響嘛...咁india既bollywood都全球3大制片地喇...
仲有..hindu同spainish都係10大language..india又係第2人口多既國家....講hindu既人都分佈5大洲..
所以india既影響力大過spain
所以india既人會好波過spain...
同樣道理sub去china唔該~
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-11-6 09:50 PM:
唔係ar ma? :eek:
你要問車版友啦:icon101:
可能我理解錯左啦,都可能斷章取義左架:sacchi:
Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-11-6 09:48 PM:
greece既戰術冇進取性可言 一味既防守反擊係對住主攻or壓力大既球隊先有用
所以WC06都冇佢份
佢亦都無能力去攻,而且條路都俾人睇通左........
不過呢樣永遠係防守球隊必定要克服的一關.......
Originally posted by stephenlion at 6-11-05 10:04 PM:
同樣道理sub去china唔該~
我都曾經想gum講 :icon101:
Originally posted by HackerWong at 2005-11-6 22:29:
我都曾經想gum講 :icon101:
講china既話..可能有米高owen會贊成
講india..先夠突出嘛~
Originally posted by 天才守門員 at 2005-11-6 21:11:
追左50頁POST
車版友經常話西班牙在大賽無表現,英格蘭係WC冠軍(只此一次:icon112:仲要主場之利:icon112:)
咁我想問,88EURO邊隊波俾雲巴士頓玩死,94WC英格蘭去左邊??
球員要有盃先成功,仲要係大盃?
咁朗尼,林伯 ...
你咁捉一二例都好片面
算la..不如:icon101: