找回密碼
 會員申請
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
樓主: Keith

Hattrick聯賽討論區XV

  [複製鏈接]
發表於 2007-5-7 23:59:42 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 TZZero 於 2007-5-7  11:52 PM 發表


no...
just the opposite...

CA depends on chance opponent missed...
so opponent midfield stronger
-> probably more chance
-> probably more missed chance
-> probably more CA chance

我記得唔知係邊度睇過一場最多只會有3個防反既se...
其他就要睇返雙方中場強弱
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:01:48 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 Keith 於 2007-5-7  11:32 PM 發表

Weakest_Link
球员表现评级和球队阵型




StrikeFC
球员表现评级和球队阵型
球队态度:         生死之战
战术:         边路进攻
战术技能:         优秀

中场:         糟糕 (非常高)
右路防守:         中下 (低)
中路防守:         中下 (非常高)
左路防守:         中下 (非常低)
右路进攻:         弱 (高)
中路进攻:         糟糕 (非常高)
左路进攻:         中下 (非常低)

本帖子中包含更多資源

您需要 登錄 才可以下載或查看,沒有賬號?會員申請

×
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:04:23 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 TZZero 於 2007-5-7  11:52 PM 發表


no...
just the opposite...

CA depends on chance opponent missed...
so opponent midfield stronger
-> probably more chance
-> probably more missed chance
-> probably more CA chance

應該唔關事
ca chance出現率 主要視乎自己既防守力 vs 對方攻擊力 ,同埋後衛既passing
而一場波入面真係好似最多得3個ca chance

希望我冇記錯~
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:12:25 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 EEEEEM 於 2007-5-8  00:04 發表

應該唔關事
ca chance出現率 主要視乎自己既防守力 vs 對方攻擊力 ,同埋後衛既passing
而一場波入面真係好似最多得3個ca chance

希望我冇記錯~


so i write 'probably' making it more difficult to say my statement is wrong

u are right that maximum having 3 tactical CA in a game...

btw for normal chance it can be also written as CA...

http://www.hattrick.org/common/matchDetails.asp?MatchID=70049766

Rules

11. Tactics

Counter-attacks
With Counter Attacks, when your opponent fails to score on an attack, you get a chance to make a counter-attack. Only one of the teams can use this benefit, namely the team that is not dominating the midfield. If you dominate the midfield, then you will just suffer the disadvantage (see below) of this tactic.

On the other hand, this tactic can be very useful if you have a strong defense and a good attack but your midfield is bad. This is especially so if your opponent has the opposite situation, as a good midfield and ineffective attack is a way of ensuring that you give your opponent a lot of missed chances to counter-attack on.

The disadvantage of this tactic is that you lose 7% of your midfield capacity.

Your ability to counter-attack, assuming you lose the midfield battle, depends on the total sum of the defending and passing skills of the defenders on your team. Only defenders count, so if you play a 5-4-1, you will have the defender and passing skills of 5 of your players contributing to your counter-attacking ability.

Passing skill is twice as important as defender skill when calculating your counter-attack ability!

When calculating your counter-attacking skill, an experience bonus is added for each defender, as with everything else.

If you manage to launch a counter-attack, it is reported as either a missed chance or a goal.

It should be noted that any team can experience counter-attack events, even if they don't select that tactic. Further, these "tactic-independent" counter-attacks do not require the team to have an inferior midfield. However the chances of them occurring in a non-counter-attacking team are slim.


text in italics is copied from Hattrick rules...

[ 本帖最後由 TZZero 於 2007-5-8  12:46 AM 編輯 ]
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:43:05 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 TZZero 於 2007-5-8  12:12 AM 發表


so i write 'probably' making it more difficult to say my statement is wrong

u are right that maximum having 3 tactical CA in a game...

btw for normal chance it can be also written as CA...

http:/ ...

究竟係7%定4%
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:48:08 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-5-8  12:43 AM 發表

究竟係7%定4%


應該係7%
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:54:15 | 顯示全部樓層
o岩o岩發現左 D5 有個人
4 May 開左隊
到而家咩人都未買
但係已經擴緊場

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:55:41 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 ic421 於 2007-5-8  12:54 AM 發表
o岩o岩發現左 D5 有個人
4 May 開左隊
到而家咩人都未買
但係已經擴緊場



點儲fans
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 00:57:14 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 dtclaw 於 2007-5-8  12:55 AM 發表


點儲fans



連 D5 o既新手個場都大過我了
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 01:01:28 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 ic421 於 2007-5-8  12:57 AM 發表



連 D5 o既新手個場都大過我了

要檢討下
立即賣哂d人擴場吧
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 01:12:24 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 TZZero 於 2007-5-8  12:12 AM 發表


so i write 'probably' making it more difficult to say my statement is wrong

u are right that maximum having 3 tactical CA in a game...

btw for normal chance it can be also written as CA...

http:/ ...

good

我一直以為計ca level時 ,defender既def skill重要過pa skills
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 01:15:35 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 EEEEEM 於 2007-5-8  01:12 發表

good

我一直以為計ca level時 ,defender既def skill重要過pa skills


ha...
i thought u know tim...

but as PM trainer i rarely use CA...
so also not familiar about that...
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 01:25:59 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 TZZero 於 2007-5-8  01:15 AM 發表


ha...
i thought u know tim...

but as PM trainer i rarely use CA...
so also not familiar about that...

我都仲有好多野唔知....
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 01:31:56 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 EEEEEM 於 2007-5-8  01:25 發表

我都仲有好多野唔知....


rmmr oymr
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 03:40:50 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 dtclaw 於 2007-5-7  08:55 AM 發表


點儲fans


玩階段係D5 點打都要 win 硬

起球場好過
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 06:18:09 | 顯示全部樓層
give up train pm for 3 weeks......
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 08:36:36 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 TinTin 於 2007-5-8  03:40 AM 發表


玩階段係D5 點打都要 win 硬

起球場好過

但係而家新player全部都入D5, 遲早冇sai d bot
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 08:41:59 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 dunspeak1999ly 於 2007-5-8  08:36 AM 發表

但係而家新player全部都入D5, 遲早冇sai d bot

已經開始左入d5啦?
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 08:44:14 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 麥旋風 於 2007-5-8  08:41 AM 發表

已經開始左入d5啦?

yep
你可以搵個網友開team試下
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-8 09:31:14 | 顯示全部樓層
而家睇番,原來上一場終於有穩定中路進攻

gray_pilgrim
球员表现评级和球队阵型
球队态度:         普通比赛
战术:         中路进攻
战术技能:         杰出

中场:         糟糕 (低)
右路防守:         差 (非常高)
中路防守:         中下 (非常低)
左路防守:         差 (非常低)
右路进攻:         糟糕 (非常高)
中路进攻:         稳定 (非常低)
左路进攻:         差 (非常低)
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|HKCM

GMT+8, 2026-8-19 08:17 , Processed in 0.034760 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表