找回密碼
 會員申請
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 2154|回復: 19

曼聯會被扣分?

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2007-5-6 16:46:58 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
英超-曼聯與埃弗頓涉嫌違反聯賽轉會條例,可能遭扣分處罰
(路透社) 05月 06日 星期日 03:59PM

路透倫敦電---  曼聯和埃弗頓(愛華頓)在門將霍華德的轉會交易中,要求他不參加上周兩隊間的英超聯賽,結果可能面臨聯賽官員的調查,並可能遭到扣分處罰。

美國國門霍華德在去年7月被曼聯租借到埃弗頓一個賽季,但今年2月已改為永久轉會。埃弗頓主帥莫耶斯稱,曼聯希望有關霍華德不能參加對曼聯比賽的租借條款,在上周六埃弗頓主場對曼聯的比賽能維持有效。

埃弗頓在該役進行到60分鐘時還以2-0領先,但隨後替補門將特納(Iain Turner)失誤送對手大禮,使曼聯得以上演大逆轉,以4-2反敗為勝,並將領先切爾西(車路士)的優勢擴大到五分。

然而周日出版的世界新聞報(News of the World)援引英超聯賽發言人的話稱,聯賽官員將就霍華德轉會交易「緊急」聯繫曼聯和埃弗頓。

雖然「額外條款」在租借交易中非常普遍,卻違反了英超聯賽有關永久轉會的規定。

「我們不允許轉會交易中有這種條款,這是明確的第三方干涉事例,」該報援引發言人的話寫道。(完)
發表於 2007-5-6 16:49:23 | 顯示全部樓層
你信?
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2007-5-6 16:54:21 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 捷克NeVeD子彈 於 2007-5-6  04:49 PM 發表
你信?

唔信, 但可能係有咁既機會架
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:00:28 | 顯示全部樓層
愛華頓係2月先簽侯活, 合約理應係下季先生效
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:03:28 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 Keith 於 2007-5-6  17:00 發表
愛華頓係2月先簽侯活, 合約理應係下季先生效


英超轉會市場1月尾就收
2月簽到侯活即係當個loan deal 完左之後即時轉投愛華頓
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:10:07 | 顯示全部樓層
同埋westham 都冇扣分, 曼聯都唔會扣掛~
希望唔好扣啦, 難得sir alex 咁開心
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:36:36 | 顯示全部樓層
低b
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:44:02 | 顯示全部樓層
咁搞笑?
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:48:07 | 顯示全部樓層
macro 有冇野發表
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:53:21 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 Scholesyip 於 2007-5-6  05:48 PM 發表
macro 有冇野發表

唔扣分佢咪又嘈囉
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:54:20 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 ken809 於 2007-5-6  05:53 PM 發表

唔扣分佢咪又嘈囉

唔扣分佢又Unfair
之後又WAF
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:55:44 | 顯示全部樓層
Everton hang on to Howard


American goalkeeper has kept 11 clean sheets in 27 games this season.

Paolo Bandini
Wednesday February 14, 2007
Guardian Unlimited

Howard has signed a five year deal that will start at the end of the season. Photograph: Gary Prior/Getty Images

Everton have made Tim Howard a permanent signing after agreeing an undisclosed fee with Manchester United.

Howard has been a big hit at Everton since joining on loan last summer, quickly establishing himself as first-choice goalkeeper and keeping 11 clean sheets in his 27 appearances so far. He has now agreed terms on a five-year deal which will begin when his loan deal expires at the end of the season.

"The club share my ambition, that is for sure - the manager does and so do the fans," said Howard after agreeing the deal. "I was drawn to the club for a number of reasons and the players in the dressing room are one of them."

http://football.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/0,,2013060,00.html
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 17:55:52 | 顯示全部樓層
A.cole果單都冇事
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 18:00:36 | 顯示全部樓層
根本講依單野就係英國既News of the World
最鍾意講埋哂D醜聞, 點知香港D報紙佬又信到十足十
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 18:01:55 | 顯示全部樓層
之前柏加由查頓去車仔都係咁啦
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 18:10:04 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 Manu super fans 於 2007-5-6  05:55 PM 發表
He has now agreed terms on a five-year deal which will begin when his loan deal expires at the end of the season.

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 21:45:44 | 顯示全部樓層
補下習啦寫中文版果位人兄
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-6 23:17:33 | 顯示全部樓層
應該係下季先正式轉會,所以冇問題....
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-7 01:50:33 | 顯示全部樓層
The Premier League are satisfied that neither Manchester United nor Everton broke any rules over the transfer of Tim Howard.

The League contacted the clubs to find out exactly why the American goalkeeper did not play in the Premiership match between them at Goodison Park last week. Howard joined Everton on a season-long loan deal from United last summer, which became a permanent deal in February. Premier League rules on loan deals prevent players from playing against their host club but, once the Howard deal became permanent, he was eligible to play against United on April 28. The Premier League would not have sanctioned the permanent transfer if United had requested a clause preventing Howard from playing against them. But before the match Everton boss David Moyes appeared to suggest there had been a verbal agreement between the clubs over Howard's omission. However, a statement from the Premier League confirmed: 'At the time of Tim Howard's permanent transfer from Manchester United to Everton, the Premier League ensured there were no agreements in place that contravened our rules. 'As a result of recent comments we had sought further clarification from both clubs and are satisfied that it remains the case that there were no agreements that breached any of our rules. 'Everton were free to play Tim Howard in their fixture against Manchester United had they so wished - and this has been confirmed by both clubs.'

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=428078&cc=4716
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-5-7 01:53:15 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 捷克NeVeD子彈 於 2007-5-6  04:49 PM 發表
你信?

有投訴就一定係真的...

入唔入到就係另一回事
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|HKCM

GMT+8, 2026-8-24 15:28 , Processed in 0.032889 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表