日藝168-你今日覆左機未啊?

henrytam

原帖由 Eggio 於 2009-6-1  10:02 PM 發表

老實
除非紐約唔resign Nate or David Lee or trade走Curry/Jeffries
否則無錢簽2件maximum
如果只簽得佢一件
LBJ想拿champ的話根本無去NYK的理由

NYK:豪華稅 is nth

橋子

估唔到susan姨得失心咁重…
搞到要去左病院…

Eggio

原帖由 henrytam 於 2009-6-1  10:03 PM 發表

NYK:豪華稅 is nth

已經唔係luxury tax的問題了
簽自家的FA用大鳥條款就可以簽幾貴都得
簽人地的FA你個salary room唔夠就簽唔到,你有幾多錢都無用
除非人地肯同你玩sign and trade

Eggio

原帖由 henrytam 於 2009-6-1  10:02 PM 發表

winner= ppl who looks for a win?
咁的話我覺得可能駁得埋

如果唔恭賀對手就係winning mentality特質之一的話,我就唔駛由頭輸到腳指尾啦
輸左先會咁,贏的話緊係想對手認7臣服於自己:t ...

根本得你自己話自己係輸家之嘛

anto

射手shooter

原帖由 Eggio 於 2009-6-1  22:08 發表

已經唔係luxury tax的問題了
簽自家的FA用大鳥條款就可以簽幾貴都得
簽人地的FA你個salary room唔夠就簽唔到,你有幾多錢都無用
除非人地肯同你玩sign and trade ...

unrestricted?
restricted?

Donald

原帖由 hoyte 於 2009-6-1  08:45 PM 發表
donald大大呢期得唔得閒,有冇興趣見面?

古都

Galliani hails 'new Capello'
Monday 1 June, 2009
Milan Vice-President Adriano Galliani believes Leonardo can emulate the success Fabio Capello had with the club in the early `90s.

Capello was offered the Milan job in 1991 having spent four years working for one of Silvio Berlusconi's companies.

Leonardo has taken the same route, although he has worked for Milan as a technical adviser since retiring as a player.

“With Leonardo, Milan want to retrace the steps they have already taken with Fabio Capello,” Galliani explained.

“Leo was a great player and great director. The scepticism that surrounds Leonardo is inferior to that which gathered around Capello, who was defined as Berlusconi's butler.”

To those who still consider Leonardo a choice imposed by Berlusconi, Galliani said: “All the decisions come to be agreed together.

“The choice of Leonardo is that of President Berlusconi and Vice-President Galliani. Leonardo was a great champion, he is an intelligent person.”

henrytam

原帖由 Eggio 於 2009-6-1  10:40 PM 發表

根本得你自己話自己係輸家之嘛

如果自己係贏,根本就唔會有"祝唔祝賀對手"呢個問題啦

hoyte

原帖由 傑夫仔 於 2009-6-1  09:05 PM 發表

入U未？

讀到10月才知

Donald

著到有D似大肚婆

[ 本帖最後由 Donald 於 2009-6-2  12:16 AM 編輯 ]

Eggio

原帖由 射手shooter 於 2009-6-1  11:19 PM 發表


unrestricted?
restricted?

唔關restrict事

In a nutshell, the Larry Bird exception allows teams to exceed the salary cap to re-sign their own free agents, at an amount up to the maximum salary. To qualify as a Bird free agent, a player must have played three seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. This means a player can obtain "Bird rights" by playing under three one-year contracts, a single contract of at least three years, or any combination thereof. It also means that when a player is traded, his Bird rights are traded with him, and his new team can use the Bird exception to re-sign him. Bird-exception contracts can be up to six years in length.

Exceptions
Because the NBA's salary cap is a soft one, the CBA allows for several important scenarios in which a team can sign players even if their payroll exceeds the cap. The exceptions are as follows:
Mid-level exception
Bi-annual exception
Rookie exception
Larry Bird exception
Non-Bird exception
我的理解如下:
假設LBJ一定要收maximum,NYK又無相等如份max contract咁大的cap room,但由於佢去第二隊就根本唔會符合果堆Bird exception,NYK簽唔到佢.咁佢去要NYK的話一定要收順d(e.g. cap room=9m,佢最多只可收9m)

restricted呢回事好似只係新秀約先有

Eggio

原帖由 Donald 於 2009-6-2  12:13 AM 發表
著到有D似大肚婆

平大

hoyte

D大呢幾日得唔得閒

Raul_Gonzalez

原帖由 Keith 於 2009-6-1  21:15 發表
話就話佢冇以前咁好
但係佢大部分時間都係傳中波出迎先派膠
依樣野好多龍門都係有問題, 強如卡斯拿斯都會見有同樣出錯
我就覺得施治好得8899

問題可能出於中堅配搭唔穩定+英超普遍攻力上升

失球不是問題, 失得難看甚或另加一些難看演出才是
08-09, 強如卡斯拿斯, 保方, 施治皆難看多了
於卡斯拿斯, 迎傳中不穩是消失多時的舊患復發

西甲就是 "絕大部份對手也有能力攻入甚或擊倒你們, 只是他們發揮不夠穩定才成不了爭標份子"

Donald

原帖由 hoyte 於 2009-6-2  12:36 AM 發表
D大呢幾日得唔得閒

星期五OK??

AC米仔

原帖由 Raul_Gonzalez 於 2009-6-2  00:38 發表


西甲就是 "絕大部份對手也有能力攻入甚或擊倒你們, 只是他們發揮不夠穩定才成不了爭標份子"

意甲就是 "絕大部份對手也有能力攻入甚或擊倒你們, 只是他們發揮不夠穩定才成不了爭標份子"

天才守門員

湯神又有新敵人?

TAMTOM

西班牙No. 1 = Reina

Raul_Gonzalez

原帖由 TAMTOM 於 2009-6-2  01:24 發表
西班牙No. 1 = Reina

拉法說的, 我知道..