Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-8-3 01:03 PM: 家下咩年代 孔明北伐都用木牛流馬 佢竟然反樸歸真
使用道具 舉報
Originally posted by hehe0114 at 2005-8-3 03:17 AM: 有d唔同意,德軍以機動同行軍快速作為其主意成功原因 係當時兩邊戰線黎睇,對ussr一定要速戰速決, 否則就如歷史般陷入進退不得既景地, 而戰事拖得愈耐,對德國一定冇好處 睇書講,德軍連多兩對襪同衫都 ...
Originally posted by Carr at 2005-8-3 04:33 PM: 睇書話有唔少將領支持直攻moscow, 咁Russia就即刻玩完 係唔知Hiltler係都要打Stalingrad 同smolensk, 浪費時間 佢d strong-hold戰術玩死自己
Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-8-3 05:33 PM: 有幾即刻玩完? 當年拿破崙入到莫斯科死得仲快
Originally posted by Neckkit at 2005-8-3 05:57 PM: 可能係心理影響>實質影響 其實1941年尾蘇軍已經輸到怕 上上下下都以為大勢已去 如果莫斯科再失守 會發生咩事好難講 不過蘇聯點先會玩完(leningrad? moscow? stalingrad? casucasian oil?)真係冇人知 打之前英美以為佢會不堪一擊
Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-3 05:58 PM: 當年拿破崙入到莫斯科時,俄國係高加索有大把支援 而最大問題係莫斯科最大保給線係係高加索 有高加索之下,打莫斯科會容易好多 而個時莫斯科係位有最多軍團的,打佢之後的確要作好多準備 所以希特拉個時做法係正 ...
Originally posted by Neckkit at 2005-8-3 05:57 PM: 可能係心理影響>實質影響 其實1941年尾蘇軍已經輸到怕 上上下下都以為大勢已去 如果莫斯科再失守 會發生咩事好難講 不過蘇聯點先會玩完(leningrad? moscow? stalingrad? casucasian oil?)真係冇人知 ...
Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-8-3 07:11 PM: 後勤唔係烏拉山脈咩?
Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-3 07:14 PM: 有,但打高加索點都容d啊呀
Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-8-3 07:15 PM: 所以我話失埋莫斯科都未必死得去
Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-8-3 07:13 PM: 空間換取時間. 中國咪又係一樣,全部重工業都係沿海,一樣可以撐8年
Originally posted by joekjen at 2005-8-3 09:25 PM: 日軍既機動力同德軍差太遠了
Originally posted by 食脾細路 at 2005-8-3 21:31: 但日軍ge後援力量同海軍卻比德軍強
Originally posted by 歐石南 at 2005-8-3 10:31 PM: 唔同意 日本係極度唔重視後勤既國家 我想問呢個topic係咪應該move去軍政呢?
Originally posted by 銀公主 at 2005-8-3 10:18 PM: 機動又點? 可以入到去邊? 一樣係泥牛入海. 東西線拉得愈長愈死
本版積分規則 發表回復 回帖並轉播 回帖後跳轉到最後一頁
Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|HKCM
GMT+8, 2026-8-16 05:32 , Processed in 0.034148 second(s), 15 queries .
Powered by Discuz! X3.5
© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.