羅比堅尼 ----> 拖肥？

TAMTOM

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-10-24 21:30:


呢個假設性問題留返畀有做功課既人答喇

Fantasista

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-10-24 09:28 PM:

如果2個光頭佬仲起度 ,我諗打442 都掂囉

2個光頭佬在陣時 卡希爾既防守工作其實近乎零

沉睡的藍

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-10-24 21:33:

唔係啊麻 ,我覺得中場多人防守當然有少少著數
但多個人起中場唔代表中場防守一定會好左架喎

但講到最尾 ,其實我覺得愛華頓防守仲算OK
但攻個度無曬一個form 先係今季致命傷 ,
佢今季買左成打攻 ...

尋晚睇左少少
simon davies好明顯心有餘而力不足，心雄到離門30碼射埋去又得
亂咁斬亦得，仲唔得左

沉睡的藍

Originally posted by Fantasista at 2005-10-24 21:36:


2個光頭佬在陣時 卡希爾既防守工作其實近乎零

專注做AMC
唔知假如華西無左艾比達同巴華夏，要艾瑪參與防守會點呢

Fantasista

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-10-24 09:33 PM:

唔係啊麻 ,我覺得中場多人防守當然有少少著數
但多個人起中場唔代表中場防守一定會好左架喎

但講到最尾 ,其實我覺得愛華頓防守仲算OK
但攻個度無曬一個form 先係今季致命傷 ,
佢今季買左成打攻 ...

同皇馬既情況一樣

[ Last edited by Fantasista on 24-10-2005 at 09:55 PM ]

Fantasista

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-10-24 09:39 PM:


專注做AMC
唔知假如華西無左艾比達同巴華夏，要艾瑪參與防守會點呢

米蘭

Tung

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-10-24 09:39 PM:


專注做AMC
唔知假如華西無左艾比達同巴華夏，要艾瑪參與防守會點呢

Cahill其實係一個creative = 0 既AMC...

沉睡的藍

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 22:24:


Cahill其實係一個creative = 0 既AMC...

純粹講緊大家司職同一位置……

Tung

Originally posted by 沉睡的藍 at 2005-10-24 10:26 PM:


純粹講緊大家司職同一位置……

佢係AMC, 但係唔係策劃型...咁樣其實Moyes想轉打法轉極有限...
一係用Osman...我覺得佢最creative, 係咁多Toffee中場裡~

女武神

Originally posted by Tung at 24-10-2005 10:29 PM:

佢係AMC, 但係唔係策劃型...咁樣其實Moyes想轉打法轉極有限...
一係用Osman...我覺得佢最creative, 係咁多Toffee中場裡~

Osman當然是最creative....雖然不見我很好...
只是他今季的狀態也是keep得不太好....
其次的Arteta...不過覺得他還是不太習慣英超的打法...

另外那位McFadden就....Moyes究竟想佢點打？

Tung

Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-10-24 11:29 PM:


Osman當然是最creative....雖然不見我很好...
只是他今季的狀態也是keep得不太好....
其次的Arteta...不過覺得他還是不太習慣英超的打法...

另外那位McFadden就....Moyes究竟想佢點打？

想佢做左邊既Osman
但係根本唔同類型

Arteta打中路好了, 不要叫佢做Beckham....

Raul_Gonzalez

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-25 00:13:
Arteta打中路好了, 不要叫佢做Beckham....

咪就係..

捷克NeVeD子彈

Originally posted by TAMTOM at 2005-10-24 09:33 PM:

唔係啊麻 ,我覺得中場多人防守當然有少少著數
但多個人起中場唔代表中場防守一定會好左架喎

但講到最尾 ,其實我覺得愛華頓防守仲算OK
但攻個度無曬一個form 先係今季致命傷 ,
佢今季買左成打攻 ...

其實愛華頓上年個451用得好
係因為5個中場入面既配搭好
加維臣+卡斯利可以守,又可以轉守為攻
兩隻翼識傳中
前面賓特入波少,但肯衝,可以拉開對手
岩晒後上既卡希爾入楔

上年加維臣走左之後似乎冇乜大影響
係因為求其搵個人頂返個位專注防守
加上卡希爾狀態好囉

捷克NeVeD子彈

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-10-24 08:22 PM:



唔該你睇返你之前句野
"莫耶斯踢既係4-5-1……你係咪想羅比打單箭頭先"

莫耶斯踢既係4-5-1?
你話羅比唔好咁睇唔開係因為愛華頓打單箭頭麻
而事實上今季愛華頓轉左4-4-2啦
咁你到底係唔知道 ...

你講咁多句冇用
你覺得自己講得一道理一句就夠數
講完

捷克NeVeD子彈

Originally posted by Fantasista at 2005-10-24 09:32 PM:


李鐵水平可能唔及正選要求
但係而家作為唯一打到dirty work既人
唔應該連一個後備/機會都無

agree既

國米~魂

VDM 咩環境

捷克NeVeD子彈

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-10-24 10:29 PM:

佢係AMC, 但係唔係策劃型...咁樣其實Moyes想轉打法轉極有限...
一係用Osman...我覺得佢最creative, 係咁多Toffee中場裡~

係囉,所以放返卡希爾落後備好過

TAMTOM

Originally posted by 國米~魂 at 2005-10-25 01:29:
VDM 咩環境

傷完先講

TAMTOM

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-10-25 01:31:


係囉,所以放返卡希爾落後備好過

做變陣棋

Tung

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 2005-10-25 01:31 AM:


係囉,所以放返卡希爾落後備好過

係囉, 我唔知幾想見佢打後備...
俾d識做地波既打中間仲好喇...
Moyes仲發緊上年Cahill上身既好夢...
老實講今年d後衛都唔放過Cahill啦~邊有咁易偷雞~