找回密碼
 會員申請
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 1944|回復: 13

West Ham fined £5.5m

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2007-4-28 10:05:28 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
West Ham avoid points deduction, but fined £5.5m

LONDON, April 27 (Reuters) - West Ham United were fined a record £5.5million ($10.97million) by a Premier League panel on Friday for breaching ownership rules over the signings of Argentines Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano last August.

West Ham admitted the charges and avoided a points deduction that would have almost certainly condemned them to relegation from the Premier League.

The fine is the biggest in English soccer history, dwarfing the old record of £1.5million imposed on Tottenham Hotspur in 1994 for financial irregularities, and reflected the club's 'dishonesty and deceit' in the affair.

The case centred on the third-party ownership of the players, who were signed from Brazilian club Corinthians but with contracts that involved giving rights to outside companies.

The transfers effectively breached Premier League rule U18 that no club should enter into a contract enabling another party to influence its policies or performances.

West Ham were also charged with failing to disclose details of the deals, thereby breaking rule B13, which obliges clubs to deal with each other and with the league in 'utmost good faith.'

In its judgment, the independent commission said: 'It is clear to us, and by their acceptance of the charge also to West Ham, that these contracts constitute a breach of Rule U18 and that those third parties acquired the ability materially to influence the club's policies or performance of the team.'

The panel added: 'These are exceedingly serious allegations because they amount to not only an obvious and deliberate breach of the Rules, but a grave breach of trust as to the FAPL (Premier League) and its constituent members, because in our finding the club has been responsible for dishonesty and deceit.'

The latter refers to a conversation in September between Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore and then West Ham chief executive Paul Aldridge.

Wanting to know how West Ham had managed to get two member of Argentina's World Cup squad without a fee, Scudamore asked Aldridge if there was any paperwork the FAPL had not seen - only to be assured there was none, the commission said.

It added: 'An officer of the club, its chief executive officer, told Mr Scudamore a direct lie, namely there was no documentation of whatever kind in respect of these players which the FAPL had not seen.'

Despite the seriousness of the affair, the commission took into account several mitigating factors.

Top of the list was that the club admitted the charges and that it had changed ownership in November, with new chairman Eggert Magnusson at the head of an Icelandic consortium.

As for the sanctions, it said: 'Some clubs, perhaps those who are locked in the relegation battle with West Ham, may be of the view that only a points deduction would be appropriate.

'We have finally come to the view that a deduction of points would not be proportionate punishment... (it) would have consigned the club to certain relegation.'

The commission fined West Ham £2.5million for rule-breaking and £3.0million for the non-disclosure, while the Premier League were given the right to terminate Tevez's registration.

In turn, the league have given West Ham until 1100 GMT on Saturday, three hours before they play Wigan Athletic, to remove the third-party ownership aspects of Tevez's registration.

West Ham are 19th in the 20-team league with three games to play.

After the verdict, West Ham said on their website: 'The club regrets the fact that they fell foul of the FA Premier League regulations, but the new owners of the club now want to focus on matters on the pitch and remaining in the Premier League.

'The threat of a points deduction has now been removed and the club's fate remains in its own hands.

'The club will reflect on the financial penalty that has been imposed and will take advice before commenting on the possibility of an appeal or any further steps that might be taken.'

5.5m
發表於 2007-4-28 13:04:38 | 顯示全部樓層
5.5m
咁堅既...
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-28 13:15:17 | 顯示全部樓層
唔使扣分,抵到爛
何況冰島人已經搵上手上席算帳
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-28 13:22:58 | 顯示全部樓層
有的是錢
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-28 13:26:14 | 顯示全部樓層
錢解決到既問題就唔係問題
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-28 13:26:36 | 顯示全部樓層
5.5m
駛唔駛罰咁多
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-29 04:30:30 | 顯示全部樓層
足總話
唔罰分係因為:

1. 認罪
2. 有關管理層已經散水
3. 罰分可能令西咸篤定降班

……
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-29 08:43:03 | 顯示全部樓層
見人有$$,咁緊係搵下著數啦
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-30 13:40:03 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 沉睡的藍 於 2007-4-29  04:30 AM 發表
足總話
唔罰分係因為:

1. 認罪
2. 有關管理層已經散水
3. 罰分可能令西咸篤定降班

……


老實講, 我都係common sense, 當然我冇任何証據唔可以亂咁講野啦; 但係以記憶之前米堡, 巴拉福特, 或者今屆的洛特咸(比人地扣左10分!), 佢地都有罰錢, 亦都有扣分, 即係好應該兩樣一齊黎以示懲戒, 咁今次呢個case, 唔好話佢地的犯錯唔比之前講嗰3隊波嚴重啊...
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-30 13:53:04 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 沉睡的藍 於 2007-4-29  04:30 AM 發表
足總話
唔罰分係因為:

1. 認罪
2. 有關管理層已經散水
3. 罰分可能令西咸篤定降班

……


第一第二係合理原因,
但係第三果個根本唔係可以脫罪ge原因黎
只係主觀地同情佢,唔想佢降班only

雖然我都唔想佢降班
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-30 15:46:14 | 顯示全部樓層
  kem , 5.5m
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-30 16:01:40 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 沉睡的藍 於 2007-4-29  04:30 AM 發表
足總話
唔罰分係因為:

1. 認罪
2. 有關管理層已經散水
3. 罰分可能令西咸篤定降班

……

咁樣多左兩個人都要降班關人咩事
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-30 16:46:23 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 沉睡的藍 於 2007-4-29  04:30 AM 發表
足總話
唔罰分係因為:

1. 認罪
2. 有關管理層已經散水
3. 罰分可能令西咸篤定降班

……

咁n年前的米杜士堡呢
就係俾人扣左3分搞到降班
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2007-4-30 19:57:38 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 henrytam 於 2007-4-30  04:46 PM 發表

咁n年前的米杜士堡呢
就係俾人扣左3分搞到降班

仲要雙料亞軍
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|HKCM

GMT+8, 2026-8-28 02:59 , Processed in 0.033176 second(s), 16 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表