莫耶斯表示打算買回加維臣

TAMTOM

有training架麻 ,一定要踢正式比賽先見真章咩

Reina Tanaka

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 2005-11-7 21:08:

出都未出過你就知佢未夠班?

唔通你有玻璃球可以預知未來?

佢季初o係預備組係有正選架....................

雖然最近5場只得1場有出...............

女武神

Originally posted by 講野無point的人 at 7-11-2005 09:06 PM:

第一季囉第七邊個踢防中o架???
李鐵冇功都有勞呀
第二季即刻踢走佢
咁同過橋抽板有咩分別???

冇態?
咁佢又可以係對德國果場截哂d波既???
當然李彥都有一定功勞

咁Phil踢左ManU咁多季咪一樣被賣走....
佢係ManU既作用我諗冇人會懷疑~
況且我唔認同踢左第一季好波，第二季就一定要用...
李鐵該季季初係比連達洛夫搶左正選（雖然我唔認為連達洛夫好過李鐵），之後就傷左....
仲要係傷兩年，我係Moyes都冇咁大信心俾佢係英超撞.....

對德國那場我冇睇，不願置評~

捷克NeVeD子彈

Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-11-7 09:33 PM:
（雖然我唔認為連達洛夫好過李鐵）

所以咪俾人放返丹麥囉

女武神

Originally posted by 捷克NeVeD子彈 at 7-11-2005 09:40 PM:


所以咪俾人放返丹麥囉

咁李鐵仲留係度係咪代表佢待遇好D？

AirKID

最清楚li tie有冇態既係睇佢training班人
唔係你同我

Smithy

冇pt遺言:

如果李鐵係有出場(就算係對西布朗踢半場都好丫)
而佢表現又係好差,完全唔夠班踢英超既,我會服
但宜家連出都冇出過,就話佢唔掂,我就一定唔服
情況正如當年既李瑋鋒

[ Last edited by Smithy on 7-11-2005 at 10:05 PM ]

Fantasista

Originally posted by AirKID at 2005-11-7 09:49 PM:
最清楚li tie有冇態既係睇佢training班人
唔係你同我

你呢句都幾萬用

Tung

Originally posted by Reina Tanaka at 2005-11-7 09:09 PM:

不過莫耶斯需要o既係全能中場而唔係純防中......

VDM Cahill Davies Arteta

誰是全能中場?
以上那4位誰是?

愛華頓陣中又有誰是全能中場?
點解一定要有全能中場?
4個中場都可以清楚地分工

Moyes用Phil, Yobo打DM唔係用黎做純防中?

Tung

Originally posted by Smithy at 2005-11-7 10:02 PM:
冇pt遺言:

如果李鐵係有出場(就算係對西布朗踢半場都好丫)
而佢表現又係好差,完全唔夠班踢英超既,我會服
但宜家連出都冇出過,就話佢唔掂,我就一定唔服
情況正如當年既李瑋鋒

[ Last edited by Smithy o ...

老實說連HKCM既toffee球迷裡,
都唔知得幾個係想李鐵可以有機會...

我唔follow無pt兄自ban..因為我要為李鐵平反

Tung

Originally posted by Reina Tanaka at 2005-11-7 09:06 PM:

未夠班打愛華頓...............................................................

[ Last edited by Reina Tanaka on 7-11-2005 at 09:07 PM ]

真?
那季他是正選..
第7
之後的一季他長傷, 下游

當然佢唔係咩必然因素
但係打dirty work我覺得係佢最好~

Tung

Originally posted by Smithy at 2005-11-7 10:02 PM:
冇pt遺言:

如果李鐵係有出場(就算係對西布朗踢半場都好丫)
而佢表現又係好差,完全唔夠班踢英超既,我會服
但宜家連出都冇出過,就話佢唔掂,我就一定唔服
情況正如當年既李瑋鋒

[ Last edited by Smithy o ...

當年大頭只可以係杯賽正選出過1場...

華頓

Originally posted by thomaskung at 2005-11-7 06:16 PM:
點解唔用李鐵...

用佢同加維臣比

Tung

Originally posted by 女武神 at 2005-11-7 09:33 PM:


咁Phil踢左ManU咁多季咪一樣被賣走....
佢係ManU既作用我諗冇人會懷疑~
況且我唔認同踢左第一季好波，第二季就一定要用...
李鐵該季季初係比連達洛夫搶左正選（雖然我唔認為連達洛夫好過李鐵），之後就傷 ...

咁Cahill上季都好波, 但今季廢到咁
Moyes照用, 用到好為止
就算Li真係係咁, 佢一定無咁既待遇...

而家既Moyes, 邊左個attack型既manager...無視防守既重要性, 又太睇重蘇格蘭人同上季功臣...Weir一大垃圾, 仲要係隊長...Cahill, McFadden, Duncan...........

Tung

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-11-7 10:33 PM:

用佢同加維臣比

唔係比
但係而家適應左without him,
又話買返黎,
原本有既防守材料又唔用
老實說除非買返黎又擺光頭twins, 如果拍Cahill/Arteta咁即係叫Gravesen打DM一樣...

華頓

Originally posted by jason4284 at 2005-11-7 03:42 PM:
有$$無地駛~~

好好笑

robbierebrov11

Originally posted by Tung at 7-11-2005 10:37 PM:

咁Cahill上季都好波, 但今季廢到咁
Moyes照用, 用到好為止
就算Li真係係咁, 佢一定無咁既待遇...

而家既Moyes, 邊左個attack型既manager...無視防守既重要性, 又太睇重蘇格蘭人同上季功臣...Weir一大垃圾, ...

佢好過Yobo

華頓

Originally posted by Tung at 2005-11-7 10:37 PM:

咁Cahill上季都好波, 但今季廢到咁
Moyes照用, 用到好為止
就算Li真係係咁, 佢一定無咁既待遇...

而家既Moyes, 邊左個attack型既manager...無視防守既重要性, 又太睇重蘇格蘭人同上季功臣...Weir一大垃圾, ...

cahill唔係廢左
係球隊轉打4-4-2後佢冇以前咁多機會後上攻門je

weir係垃圾?無言

Tung

Originally posted by 華頓 at 2005-11-7 10:47 PM:

cahill唔係廢左
係球隊轉打4-4-2後佢冇以前咁多機會後上攻門je

weir係垃圾?無言

至少差過高特立~

Tung

Originally posted by robbierebrov11 at 2005-11-7 10:44 PM:


佢好過Yobo

高過yobo就真
講真佢咩勁我真係唔知~
俾我揀我寧願揀Stubbs都唔要佢
但無計
佢同Duncan都係蘇格蘭人
所以Stubbs同Campbell咪走lor